This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on ISI (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letter  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Neoplasms  • Diagnosis  • Alert me on articles by topic

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

I thank Lombardo¹ for his stimulating comments on my article, "Dermoscopy Subpatterns of Nonpigmented Skin Tumors,"² regarding the value of dermoscopy for the diagnosis. To his question, "Am I missing something . . . ?" I can only reply, yes—a new and fascinating dimension of morphologic structures that simply escapes the naked eye, however good this eye might be. This explains, for example, why dermoscopists are able to reduce the number of unnecessary excisions of benign skin tumors³ compared with the number of tumors found during clinical examination and to help pathologists in their diagnosis by selecting more representative areas of suspicious lesions for biopsy.⁴ Especially in the case of amelanotic melanoma or melanoma that looks clinically benign, the dermoscopic vascular pattern or a missing clinical-dermoscopic correlation might be the only clue to raise the index of suspicion and to avoid incorrect treatment and delayed diagnosis.⁵ Lombardo correctly points out the great value of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Iris Zalaudek, MD

RELATED LETTER

Value of Dermoscopy?
Peter C. Lombardo
Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(11):1466.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT