This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on ISI (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Internet  • Telemedicine  • Patient-Physician Communication  • Dermatologic Disorders, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Most teledermatology systems involve a general practitioner (GP) serving as intermediary between patient and dermatologist.^1-2 In view of increasing patient empowerment and interest in telehealth, we conducted a pilot study to examine a teledermatology service in which the patients were the main information providers and receivers.³ This article describes patient perceptions of "patient-assisted" teledermatology.

Methods

We included in our study all patients who (1) were routinely and nonurgently referred by their GP to a dermatologist; (2) were able to provide electronic images of their skin disorder; and (3) were able to fill out forms on the Internet, with or without help. Patients filled out and submitted a structured form via the study Web site, attaching up to 4 images. A teledermatologist replied within 1 working day via the same Web site, providing a diagnosis and advice directly to the patient. Within 2 days of filling out the forms, all patients visited . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Results

Comment

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Nina Eminovi, MsC; Leonard Witkamp, PhD, MD; Nicolette F. de Keizer, PhD; Jeremy C. Wyatt, DM, FRCP, F(ACMI)