You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 7, July 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Success in the Dermatology Resident Match in 2003: Perceptions and Importance of Home Institutions and Away Rotations

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Yearly, hundreds of candidates apply for a small number of dermatology residency positions. The ideal match between candidates and programs can be optimized by an understanding of variables affecting program selection. Studies of the residency match have been conducted,1-5 yet none have focused on dermatology. We conducted a survey of applicants matching in dermatology programs in 2003 to define the variables that affect the match.

Methods

In April 2003, electronic surveys were sent to matchees through the Dermatology Bulletin Board (http://p204.ezboard.com/bdermatology), an internet message board for dermatology applicants. Surveys were also sent to program directors to distribute to incoming residents. The survey included 14 demographic questions and 34 attitude questions grouped into 5 categories: program characteristics, curriculum, research, interview day, and location. The attitude questions were scored on a 4-point Likert scale as very important, somewhat important, not very important, or not at all important. For analysis, the data . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Results

Comment

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Jennie T. Clarke, MD; Jeffrey J. Miller, MD; Jennifer Sceppa, MD; Lowell A. Goldsmith, MD; Erin Long, MD


RELATED LETTER

Academic Dermatology
Jashin J. Wu
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(12):1650-1651.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Dermatology Residency Program Characteristics That Correlate With Graduates Selecting an Academic Dermatology Career
Jashin J. Wu, Claudia C. Ramirez, Carol A. Alonso, Natalia Mendoza, Brian Berman, and Stephen K. Tyring
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(7):845-850.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Residents' Loss of Interest in Academic Careers and Identification of Correctable Factors
Samuel J. Reck, Erik J. Stratman, Curt Vogel, and Bickol N. Mukesh
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(7):855-858.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Academia Is the Life for Me, I’m Sure
Kevin F. Kia, Robert A. Gielczyk, and Charles N. Ellis
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(7):911-913.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Otolaryngology residency selection process. Medical student perspective
S. P. Stringer, N. J. Cassisi, and W. H. Slattery
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118(4):365-366.
ABSTRACT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Academic Dermatology
Wu
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:1650-1651.
FULL TEXT  

Academia Is the Life for Me, I'm Sure.
Kia et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:911-913.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.