You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 9, September 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Skin Cancer
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Surgery
 •Non-cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Neoplasms
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Dermatologic Procedures
 •Dermatologic Procedures, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Cost-effectiveness of Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Surgical Excision for Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Face

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

If one carefully reads the study by Essers et al1 along with the trial published in the Lancet2 on which it is based, it is apparent that the trial did not involve a randomization of patients to Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) vs surgical excision. Therefore, conclusions about cost and therapeutic effectiveness may be misleading.

The form of MMS performed in the study by Essers et al used a 3-mm Mohs margin and resulted in a defect 4 mm larger than that obtained with a standard 1-mm Mohs margin. Whereas in standard MMS the surgeon performs pathologic analysis for a single fee, this study used a separate pathologist thereby increasing costs. Based on these 2 important methodological differences, the findings regarding tissue sparing, cost, and cosmesis may be inapplicable to MMS in the United States.

Additionally, patients did not undergo standard surgical excision. A standardized resection of 3 mm of margin . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Clark C. Otley, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness of Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Surgical Excision for Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Face—Reply
Brigitte A. B. Essers, Carmen D. Dirksen, and H. A. Martino Neumann
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(9):1235-1236.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Surgical Excision for Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Face
Brigitte A. B. Essers, Carmen D. Dirksen, Fred H. M. Nieman, Nicole W. J. Smeets, Gertrude A. M. Krekels, Martin H. Prins, and H. A. Martino Neumann
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(2):187-194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.