This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Evidence-Based Medicine  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Dermatology, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Grading Recommendations and Evidence Quality

June K. Robinson, MD; Robert P. Dellavalle, MD, PhD, MSPH; Michael Bigby, MD; Jeffrey P. Callen, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(1):97-99.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

With the profusion of medical information and its ease of access, dermatologists need a reliable source that carefully weighs the data presented in clinical studies and observations. The Archives of Dermatology endeavors to be that source. Our publication of a study or observation and the accompanying invited editorial sends a strong signal to clinicians about the importance of implementing the recommendations. In 2007, the Archives gradually shifted the focus of review articles to emphasize systematic reviews that rank the available evidence (Table 1).¹ Systematic reviews help to define medical practice standards and are learning tools for medical students and residents.

Table appears in full text version. Table 1. Systematic Reviews and Review Articles

Evidence-based practice relies on 3 key areas to reach a treatment decision: the best available research evidence; patient and family characteristics, values, and preferences; . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION