 |
|
Early Recognition at Last
Harald Kittler, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(4):533-534.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
If all melanomas were diagnosed in situ, no one would die of this disease.1 This is an ideal concept and an unrealistic scenario, but we should at least try to come close to it by detecting melanomas as early as possible. One of the most important prerequisites to accomplish this task is the existence of reliable criteria for the detection of melanomas when they are still small and flat. However, clinical criteria such as the ABCD rule do not work for small melanomas. This becomes evident when considering the letter D of the acronym ABCD, which stands for diameter. A diameter of 6 mm or less is generally regarded as a sign of benignancy, suggesting that melanomas 6 mm or smaller do not exist. In reality, all melanomas start smaller than 6 mm, but at this stage most of them are not asymmetrical, do not . . . [Full Text of this Article]
AUTHOR INFORMATION
RELATED ARTICLES
The Diagnostic Performance of Expert Dermoscopists vs a Computer-Vision System on Small-Diameter Melanomas
Robert J. Friedman, Dina Gutkowicz-Krusin, Michele J. Farber, Melanie Warycha, Lori Schneider-Kels, Nicole Papastathis, Martin C. Mihm, Jr, Paul Googe, Roy King, Victor G. Prieto, Alfred W. Kopf, David Polsky, Harold Rabinovitz, Margaret Oliviero, Armand Cognetta, Darrell S. Rigel, Ashfaq Marghoob, Jason Rivers, Robert Johr, Jane M. Grant-Kels, and Hensin Tsao
Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(4):476-482.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Assessment of the Optimal Interval for and Sensitivity of Short-term Sequential Digital Dermoscopy Monitoring for the Diagnosis of Melanoma
Davide Altamura, Michelle Avramidis, and Scott W. Menzies
Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(4):502-506.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
