You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 6, June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  skINsight
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Skin Cancer
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Neoplasms
 •Diagnosis
 •Radiologic Imaging, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Polarized and Nonpolarized Dermoscopy

The Explanation for the Observed Differences

Yan Pan, BMedSc; Daniel S. Gareau, PhD; Alon Scope, MD; Milind Rajadhyaksha, PhD; Nizar A. Mullani, BSc; Ashfaq A. Marghoob, MD
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Drs Pan, Gareau, Scope, Rajadhyaksha, and Marghoob); 3GEN LLC and TransLite LLC, Houston, Texas (Mr Mullani)

Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(6):828-829.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Differences in observed structures, colors, and patterns present in lesions imaged with nonpolarized dermoscopes (NPDs) and polarized dermoscopes (PDs) have been previously noted.1-2 Herein we address the science behind the differences observed and present representative lesions in which these differences can be appreciated. Under normal conditions, most of the light that impinges on the skin surface will be reflected (ie, specular reflectance or glare) due to the higher refractive index of the stratum corneum (1.55) compared with that of air (1.0). An NPD reduces this reflection by using a liquid interface that optically matches the refractive index of the glass plate of the dermoscope (approximately 1.52) with the stratum corneum.1 Elimination of the air interface reduces the amount of light reflected off the stratum corneum (Figure 1, . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Observation of Chrysalis Structures With Polarized Dermoscopy
Marghoob et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:618-618.
FULL TEXT  

Trichoscopy Using a Handheld Dermoscope: An In-Office Technique to Diagnose Genetic Disease of the Hair
Silverberg et al.
Arch Dermatol 2009;145:600-601.
FULL TEXT  

Remodeling of the Dermoepidermal Junction in Superficial Spreading Melanoma: Insights Gained From Correlation of Dermoscopy, Reflectance Confocal Microscopy, and Histopathologic Analysis
Scope et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1644-1649.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.