You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 7, July 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Bullous Diseases
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Pemphigoid
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Immunology
 •Immunologic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
Comparative Effectiveness of Azathioprine or Mycophenolate Mofetil as an Adjuvant for the Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid

Jean-Claude Bystryn, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Beissert and colleagues1 are to be commended for conducting one of the few randomized therapeutic trials on bullous pemphigoid. They conclude that mycophenolate mofetil is preferable to azathioprine when combined with oral methylprednisolone for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid because it is similarly effective but less toxic.

However, the opposite conclusion can be drawn from the data presented—that azathioprine is more effective and overall just as safe as mycophenolate mofetil. The time to induce complete remission, cumulative dose of steroids used, and duration of remission were all better in patients treated with azathioprine than in those treated with mycophenolate mofetil. The statistical significance of these findings was not analyzed, but some of the differences are impressive. The average time to induce complete remission was 50% shorter, and time to induce remission in 100% of patients was 3 times shorter in patients treated with azathioprine (n = 38) than in . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.