 |
 |

Melanocytic Proliferations Associated With Lichen Sclerosus
J. Andrew Carlson, MD, FRCPC;
Xiao C. Mu, MD, PhD;
Andrzej Slominski, MD, PhD;
Kaare Weismann, MD, PhD;
A. Neil Crowson, MD;
John Malfetano, MD;
Victor G. Prieto, MD, PhD;
Martin C. Mihm, Jr, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:77-87.
ABSTRACT
 |  |
Objectives To describe the clinicopathologic features of melanocytic proliferations
associated with lichen sclerosus (LS) and to compare these findings with those
in controls.
Design Cohort study.
Setting Academic and private practice dermatology and dermatopathology services.
Patients Cases of melanocytic proliferations associated with LS and consecutive
controls with persistent (recurrent) melanocytic nevi, persistent malignant
melanomas, and compound melanocytic nevi.
Main Outcome Measures Diagnostic criteria and disease recurrence.
Results Eleven patients, all female, with a mean age of 40 years (range, 8-83
years), presented with pigmented lesions clinically suspected to be malignant
melanoma or atypical melanocytic nevi affecting the vulva (7 patients), perineum
(3 patients), or chest (1 patient). Lichen sclerosus was first identified
in the biopsy specimen and subsequently confirmed clinically. In 10 cases,
a melanocytic nevus was superimposed on LS (overlying or entrapped by sclerosis),
whereas LS was found at the periphery of vulvar malignant melanoma. After
complete excision, no recurrences have been reported for the melanocytic nevi
in LS (mean follow-up, 29 months; range, 4-60 months). Compared with control
lesions, the LS melanocytic nevi most closely resembled persistent melanocytic
nevi and could be distinguished from persistent malignant melanoma histologically.
Melanocytes, nevoid or malignant, proliferating contiguously with fibrotic
or sclerotic collagen, contained abundant melanin, diffusely expressed HMB-45,
and had a higher Ki-67 labeling index than ordinary melanocytic nevi. However,
persistent malignant melanoma exhibited mitotic figures, significantly higher
Ki-67 labeling index, and deep dermal HMB-45 expression compared with LS melanocytic
nevi and persistent melanocytic nevi.
Conclusions Melanocytic nevi occurring in LS have features in common with persistent
melanocytic nevi and can mimic malignant melanoma. An "activated" melanocytic
phenotype is seen in LS melanocytic nevi, implicating a stromal-induced change.
INTRODUCTION
MELANOCYTES overlying scars exhibit an activated, regenerative phenotype
manifested by HMB-45 expression and increased proliferation.1-3
In consequence, scars can exhibit clinical pigmentation or melanocytic hyperplasia.4-5 When the scar pigmentation is secondary
to a persistent ("recurrent") melanocytic nevus, the histologic findings can
be striking and mimic those of malignant melanoma, thus the moniker "pseudomelanoma."6-9 Keratinocytes
overlying the dermal sclerosis in lesions of lichen sclerosus (LS) also manifest
a regenerative phenotype.10 However, clinical
pigmentation in LS is infrequent11 and melanocytic
proliferations in LS are rare11-13
and difficult to interpret.14 In this study,
we collected cases of melanocytic proliferations occurring in lesions of LS
to determine their clinical pathologic characteristics and natural course.
To more closely delineate the pathologic changes, we compared these LS-associated
melanocytic lesions with ordinary compound (nondysplastic) melanocytic nevi,
persistent melanocytic nevi, and persistent malignant melanoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
CASE SELECTION
Eleven cases (slides and blocks) with clinical data from pathology reports
and clinical records of melanocytic proliferations (10 melanocytic nevi and
1 malignant melanoma) identified within a field of LS were retrieved from
the consultation files of one of us (M.C.M.) (2 cases) and from the dermatology
and/or dermatopathology services of others of us (J.A.C., 5 cases; A.N.C.,
2 cases; K.W., 1 case; and V.G.P., 1 case) (Table 1). One case (patient 2) was described previously.11 For comparison, consecutive controls consisting of
12 recurrent or persistent melanocytic nevi, 7 incompletely excised or persistent
malignant melanomas (4 in situ and 3 invasive), and 9 ordinary compound melanocytic
nevi were retrieved from the files of the Albany Medical College Dermatopathology
Service, Albany, NY. One additional case of persistent melanocytic nevi was
found (by K.W.) in which dermoscopic examination had been performed.
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Clinical and Pathologic Features of Melanocytic Proliferations
Occurring in LS*
|
|
|
Compound (ordinary) melanocytic nevi were selected on the basis of the
absence of lamellar fibrosis or concentric eosinophilic fibrosis, lymphocytic
infiltrates, fusion of rete ridges, or lateral extension of the junctional
componentall features of so-called dysplastic melanocytic nevi.15
HISTOLOGIC ANALYSIS
Hematoxylin-eosinstained slides from paraffin-embedded tissue
were evaluated. To determine whether melanocytic proliferations arising in
a field of LS more closely resembled persistent melanocytic nevi or persistent
malignant melanoma, the presence or absence of the following features was
assessed on the basis of the criteria originally described by Ackerman et
al6 and Kornberg and Ackerman7
and further extended by Park et al9:
- Sharp circumscription of epidermal melanocytes
(ie, do individual melanocytes extend beyond the lateral confines of the dermal
fibrosis or sclerosis?)
- Pagetoid scatter (melanocytes above the basal keratinocyte
layer)
- Melanocytic nests within the fibrosis or sclerosis
- Confluent melanocytic nests (large melanocytic
nests running parallel with the epidermis)
- Lentiginous melanocytic hyperplasia
- Trizonal pattern: pagetoid scatter and or confluently
nested melanocytes (melanoma in situ pattern) separated by fibrosis or sclerosis
from a residual intradermal melanocytic nevus
- Dermal melanocytic mitotic figures
- Presence of a lymphocytic host response
If mitotic figures were identified, the number of mitotic figures per
high-power field was counted. For cases exhibiting a lymphocytic host response,
the lymphocytic infiltrate was further classified as infiltrative (dense infiltrates
of lymphocytes surrounding and permeating melanocytic nests) or not (Table 2).
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Comparison of Melanocytic Proliferations Arising in LS With
Those in Compound Melanocytic Nevi, Persistent (Recurrent) Melanocytic Nevi,
and Persistent (Locally Recurrent) Malignant Melanoma*
|
|
|
As the melanocytes in LS melanocytic nevi, persistent melanocytic nevi,
and persistent malignant melanoma are conspicuous, the nuclear and cell diameter
of both intraepidermal and dermal melanocytes were measured with a micrometer
at x400 magnification (each unit equals 2.5 µm) to determine whether
cell or nuclear size differed among the 4 diagnostic categories. Five representative
cells of the epidermal and dermal compartments in each case were measured,
from which a mean value was generated. Nuclear-to-cell diameter ratio was
calculated with the use of these mean values (Table 2).
HISTOCHEMISTRY AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY
Fontana-Masson staining for melanin was performed. Keratinocyte and
intraepidermal and dermal melanocyte melanization was histologically assessed
in comparison with normal skin as either hypermelanotic, melanotic, hypomelanotic,
or amelanotic.
Immunohistochemistry was performed with an automated diaminobenzidine
immunohistochemistry system (Ventana ES; Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson,
Ariz) with antibodies against HMB-45 (PMEL17/gp100) (prediluted, Ventana Medical
Systems, Inc), and Ki-67 (prediluted, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc). The number
of melanocytes labeled with these antibodies per 100 melanocytes was counted
to derive the labeling index in both the epidermal and dermal compartments
(Table 2).
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical analysis was performed with the STATA software package (Stata
Corp, College Station, Tex). Differences between groups were tested by the 2 test for dichotomous variables, t test for
continuous variables, and analysis of variance (means) for continuous variables
across categories. Logistic regression methods were used for categorical analysis.
Differences were considered significant when P<.05.
RESULTS
CLINICAL FINDINGS
LS-Associated Melanocytic Proliferations
Eleven melanocytic proliferations were identified arising in a region
of skin affected by LS (Table 1).
These patients were all female, with mean age of 40 years (median, 31 years;
range, 8-83 years). These pigmented lesions had a mean size of 6 mm (range,
2-18 mm) and involved the vulva (mostly mucosal areas such as labia minora
and clitoris) or perineum in 10. All of these tan or dark-brown to black macules
were studied by biopsy to exclude malignant melanoma or an atypical or dysplastic
melanocytic nevi (Figure 1). The
suggestive clinical symptoms or signs were irregular borders, black clinical
appearance, recent growth, and/or recent onset of pruritus. No patient described
a history of a long-standing melanocytic nevi with recent change. The duration
of symptoms or known presence of the pigmented lesion was less than 2 months.
In addition, the clinical presence of LS was not noted at the initial physical
examination in any of the 11 cases. Reappraisal of the affected region after
biopsy or excision demonstrated the ivory-white color of LS in the skin surrounding
the biopsy site. All of these patients had their melanocytic proliferations
completely excised, some with wide margins. No local recurrence, regional
lymph node spread, or systemic spread has been reported to date, with a mean
disease-free time of 29 months (range, 4-60 months).
|
|
|
|
Figure 1. Clinical and dermoscopic views
of melanocytic nevi arising in lichen sclerosus (A and B) and a surgical scar
(C and D). Dermoscopy (10x) using immersion oil shows dark brown to
black homogeneous pigmentation (B) and more irregular areas of pigmentation
(D). In both cases, the bandlike extensions of pigmentation indicate the presence
of a melanocytic pigmentation. In addition, there is a pronounced whitish
veil reflecting the presence of hyperkeratosis and perilesional inflammation
in B. Both this persistent melanocytic nevus and the lichen sclerosus melanocytic
nevus meet the "ABCD" rule of dermoscopy for the identification of malignant
melanoma.16 The scale in part C is in centimeters.
|
|
|
By age, patients with melanocytic proliferations arising in LS were
significantly younger than those with persistent malignant melanoma (t test, P = .01), and by size,
these macules were significantly larger than those of persistent melanocytic
nevi (t test, P = .01).
Persistent Melanocytic Nevi
The patients with persistent melanocytic nevi included 8 females and
5 males with a mean age of 36 years (range, 15-75 years). They all had variable
dotlike or linear, streaklike macules ranging in size from 1 to 5 mm (mean,
3 mm) arising in the scar of a previously excised compound or predominantly
intradermal melanocytic nevus (Figure 1).
These persistent nevi recurred within the scar in a mean time of 6 months
(range, 1-18 months). They were located on the trunk (6 cases), head and neck
(2 cases), pubis and perineum (2 cases), and extremities (3 cases).
Persistent Malignant Melanoma
The 7 patients with persistent melanoma were 2 women and 5 men with
a mean age of 66 years (range, 55-78 years). Their malignant melanomas recurred
within the surgical scar in a mean time of 40 months (range, 24-60 months)
and presented as irregular-bordered brown to black macules or papules with
a mean diameter of 7 mm (range, 2-15 mm). These persistent malignant melanomas
were located on the chest or shoulder (3 cases), arm (2 cases), and face and
calf (1 case each). Compared with persistent melanocytic nevi, persistent
malignant melanoma reoccurred significantly later after primary excision (40
vs 6 months; t test, P =
.004).
Ordinary Compound Melanocytic Nevi
The patients with melanocytic nevi were 3 females and 6 males with a
mean age of 32 years (range, 15-42 years). Their nevi ranged in size from
2 to 8 mm (mean, 5 mm); the nevi were located on the trunk (6 cases) and the
neck, pubis, and cheek (1 case each). Each nevus was excised to exclude the
diagnosis of melanoma or to confirm the clinical impression of dysplastic
melanocytic nevus because of their irregular borders and variegated coloration
from light brown to dark brown.
HISTOLOGIC FEATURES
Melanocytic proliferations arising in LS were interpreted as junctional
melanocytic nevi (5 cases), compound melanocytic nevi (3 cases), intradermal
melanocytic nevi (2 cases), or malignant melanoma (1 case). Except for the
case of malignant melanoma, all of the LS melanocytic nevi were superimposed
on the pathognomonic dermal sclerosis of LS,11
and those with junctional nests all showed well-circumscribed lateral margins.
In these cases, LS extensively involved the surrounding skin. For cases of
LS melanocytic nevi with a dermal melanocytic component, superficial and middermal
melanocytic nests were entrapped in the sclerosis. These latter melanocytes
were larger than the uninvolved deeper dermal, "residual" melanocytes in melanocytic
nevi and exhibited abundant dusty gray cytoplasm and vesicular nuclei similar
to melanocytes within the epidermis overlying the sclerosis of LS. All of
the LS melanocytic nevi had sparse to dense lymphocytic infiltrates underlying
the dermal sclerosis, and in more than half of the cases these lymphocytic
infiltrates surrounded and disrupted dermal and junctional melanocytic nests
(Figure 2).
|
|
|
|
Figure 2. Histologic findings suggestive
of malignant melanoma in melanocytic nevi found with skin affected by lichen
sclerosus. A, Scanning magnification shows an asymmetric but well-demarcated
junctional melanocytic nevus within a field of lichen sclerosus (hematoxylin-eosin,
original magnification x20). B, Note the presence of enlarged confluent
junctional melanocytic nests (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x100).
C, Confluent junctional nests with extension down adnexal epithelium and scattered
hyperpigmented dermal nests (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x200).
D, Scattered pagetoid upward migration of nests and solitary melanocytes in
conjunction with confluent, melanized, and enlarged nested melanocytes (hematoxylin-eosin,
original magnification x200).
|
|
|
In the 1 case of malignant melanoma, the characteristic histologic changes
of LS were found at the periphery of the malignant melanoma, neither immediately
adjacent to nor underlying it, as found for LS melanocytic nevi. This lesion
was histologically diagnosed as a nodular malignant melanoma. Its characteristics
consisted of focal pagetoid spread overlying large, sheetlike dermal nests
of markedly pleomorphic melanocytes that exhibited numerous mitotic figures
(8 per 10 high-power fields) and had a tumor thickness of 2.7 mm, Clark level
4. No changes of regression and a sparse tumor infiltrating lymphocytic host
response were evident.
Histologic Features of LS Melanocytic Nevi vs Persistent Melanocytic
Nevi and Persistent Malignant Melanoma
The vulvar malignant melanoma that was surrounded but not directly involved
by the LS was excluded from this analysis. The LS melanocytic nevi had many
features in common with persistent melanocytic nevi, such as confluent junctional
nests, pagetoid melanocyte spread, nests of melanocytes trapped within dermal
sclerosis, lentiginous melanocytic hyperplasia, peritumoral lymphocytic infiltrates,
residual dermal melanocytic nevus, and the presence of a trizonal pattern
(Table 2). Most of these histologic
features were also present in persistent malignant melanoma. The presence
of lateral extension of intraepidermal melanocytes beyond the dermal fibrosis,
the absence of a residual intradermal melanocytic nevus, absence of a trizonal
pattern, and/or presence of dermal mitotic figures differentiated malignant
melanoma from both LS melanocytic nevi and persistent melanocytic nevi (logistic
regression, univariate and multivariate analysis, P<.001).
In addition, the finding of pagetoid scatter, although present in all 3 clinical
settings, occurred significantly more often in persistent malignant melanoma
and was predictive of malignant melanoma ( 2 and logistic regression
tests, P .01). Moreover, confluent junctional
nests were significantly more common in both persistent malignant melanoma
and LS melanocytic nevi than in persistent melanocytic nevi ( 2
test, P = .03).
Melanin Content
In regions of the epidermis overlying scars without an intraepidermal
melanocytic proliferation (nevoid or malignant melanocytes), keratinocytes
were hypomelanized as compared with those of the adjacent normal epidermis.
Dendritic, "nonproliferating" melanocytes in these regions showed normal to
diminished melanin content. In stark contrast, both melanocytes and contiguous
keratinocytes in regions of melanocytic proliferations overlying dermal fibrosis
and sclerosis exhibited hypermelanization compared with normal adjacent epidermis.
In addition, numerous melanin granules were present throughout all layers
of the affected epidermis (spinous, granular, and stratum corneum) compared
with normal epidermis, where melanin was concentrated in the basal layer overlying
the nucleus. Dermal melanocytes entrapped within the fibrosis or sclerosis
also showed hypermelanization (Figure 3).
The degree and extent of melanin content were similar between LS nevi and
persistent nevi, whereas these findings were more variable in persistent malignant
melanoma, ranging from focal melanization of melanocytes to intense and diffuse
hypermelanization of both malignant melanocytes and adjacent keratinocytes.
In ordinary melanocytic nevi, scattered nested or solitary melanocytes and
adjacent keratinocytes and scattered superficial dermal melanocytes showed
hypermelanization.
|
|
|
|
Figure 3. Melanocyte "activation" in the
form of melanin production and HMB-45 expression overlying and within scars
and dermal sclerosis. A, Fontana-Masson stain for melanin in persistent melanocytic
nevus showing marked pigmentation of both keratinocytes and melanocytes within
the epidermis and dermal melanocytes affected by the scar. Note that the underlying,
uninvolved residual dermal melanocytic nevus is without melanin (original
magnification x40). B, In lichen sclerosus, keratinocytes are generally
hypomelanized (left side). However, both melanocytes and keratinocytes of
a melanocytic nevus are hypermelanized and are accompanied by numerous melanophages
(right) (Fontana-Masson stain, original magnification x100). C, Intense
and diffuse HMB-45 expression in a compound melanocytic nevus affected by
lichen sclerosus. Note diminishment in both intensity of staining and size
of the dermal melanocytes at the lower edge of the dermal sclerosis and inflammation
(HMB-45, original magnification x40).
|
|
|
Melanocyte Cell and Nuclear Size
Both qualitatively and quantitatively, melanocytes in LS melanocytic
nevi and persistent melanocytic nevi most closely resembled one another, were
slightly larger than those in ordinary nevi, and were significantly smaller
than those in persistent malignant melanoma (analysis of variance, P .01) (Table 2). In
general, nevoid melanocytes of LS nevi and persistent nevi showed "pagetoid"
cytologic findings in the form of enlarged cells with abundant pale to dusty
gray cytoplasm and oval, vesicular (reactive) nucleus with prominent nucleoli.
Similar-appearing melanocytes could also be found in the junctional nests
of compound melanocytic nevi, but these cells were not as prevalent. Dermal
nevoid melanocytes not affected by dermal fibrosis or sclerosis (residual
melanocytic nevi) were similar qualitatively and quantitatively to ordinary
melanocytic nevi. Although the melanocytes in persistent malignant melanoma
were significantly larger than those in the other 3 categories, the ratio
of cell diameter to nuclear diameter did not significantly differ between
any of the 4 categories.
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL FINDINGS
HMB-45 Expression
Intense and diffuse labeling of melanocytes by HMB-45 was found in LS
melanocytic nevi and persistent melanocytic nevi, particularly for the epidermal
component compared with superficial dermal melanocytes entrapped within sclerosis
or fibrosis (Table 2). In addition,
melanocytes entrapped in fibrosis or sclerosis showed more intense and extensive
HMB-45 labeling than did superficial dermal melanocytes of ordinary melanocytic
nevi. Morphometric analysis of the frequency and intensity of immunostaining
showed that LS melanocyte nevi and persistent melanocytic nevi had significantly
larger labeling indexes than those of compound melanocytic nevi (analysis
of variance, P<.001). Although both LS nevi and
persistent nevi had a larger fraction of dermal melanocytes marking with HMB-45,
their staining was not significantly different from that of compound melanocytic
nevi. Persistent malignant melanoma's HMB-45 labeling index, both epidermal
and dermal compartments, was not significantly different from that of LS melanocytic
nevi or persistent melanocytic nevi. However, within the dermis, HMB-45 staining
was generally greater and could be found in the deep dermisa characteristic
not found in persistent melanocytic nevi, LS melanocytic nevi, or ordinary
melanocytic nevi.
Ki-67 Antigen Expression
Ki-67 (MIB-1) is a cell cycle antigen expressed throughout all active
stages of the cell cycle (G1, S, G2, and M); thus, the
number of cells expressing this antigen would represent the number of proliferating
cells.17 The highest Ki-67 labeling index was
found in persistent malignant melanoma, being significantly greater than that
in LS melanocytic nevi, persistent melanocytic nevi and ordinary melanocytic
nevi for both epidermal and dermal melanocytes (analysis of variance, P<.001) (Table 2).
There was no significant difference between the latter 3 entities in Ki-67
labeling.
COMMENT
Lichen sclerosus is a chronic fibroinflammatory dermatosis of unknown
etiology that can produce substantial discomfort and morbidity.10-11,18-19
Although LS most commonly occurs in women, it is also found in men and children.
Any skin site may be affected; however, LS is most prevalent in the anogenital
area, where it sometimes causes intractable itching, soreness, and, in some
patients, destructive scarring and/or squamous cell carcinoma.10, 19
Lichen sclerosus can occur without symptoms, which may, in part, be responsible
for its uncertain prevalence. In children, LS, predominantly vulvar and often
unrecognized, can be interpreted as a sign of sexual abuse because of purpura
and erosions, or can lead to dysuria and pain on defecation.18, 20-26
Rarely, childhood LS has been reported concomitant with vulvar malignant melanoma.12-13 Clinically, LS is denoted by its
white, nonpigmented or vitiligolike appearance. Clinical pigmentation caused
by a melanocytic proliferation as a presenting sign of vulvar LS has not been
reported in childhood LS,18, 20-26
but this pattern of presentation appears to affect about 1% of women with
LS.11 The clinicopathologic findings of the
LS junctional and compound melanocytic nevi occurring in young females presented
herein are strikingly similar to those reported for vulvar malignant melanoma
associated with LS12-13 (Table 1). In contrast, our one case of
vulvar malignant melanoma associated with LS at its periphery has more in
common with conventional vulvar malignant melanoma.
Both childhood and vulvar malignant melanoma are rare, with incidences
of 0.8 to 8 per million27-28 and
1 per million,29 respectively. Established
risk factors for childhood malignant melanoma are giant and small congenital
melanocytic nevi, xeroderma pigmentosum, atypical or dysplastic mole syndrome,
eruptive melanocytic nevi associated with immunosuppression, preexisting common
acquired melanocytic nevi, and cutaneous sensitivity to the effects of sun
exposure (ie, freckling).27-28,30-46
Neither LS nor a vulvar location has been described in these reported series
of childhood malignant melanoma. In comparison, vulvar malignant melanoma
is thought to be biologically different from cutaneous malignant melanoma,29 and, on the basis of incidence and relative surface
areas affected, malignant melanoma may in fact show a predisposition for the
vulva compared with nongenital skin.47-48
Furthermore, vulvar malignant melanoma is a disease of older women (median
age, 66 years at diagnosis29) and has a much
poorer prognosis than cutaneous malignant melanoma (47% vs 80% 5-year survival).49 In a study of 219 Swedish women, only 18 were younger
than 44 years and none was younger than 15 years.50
Nonetheless, 6 girls younger than 16 years have been described with vulvar
malignant melanoma in several large series.29, 51-55
With respect to LS and vulvar malignant melanoma, LS has not been histologically
documented in any series of vulvar malignant melanoma,29, 47-49,51-81
although the possibility of its presence exists on the basis of clinical descriptions
of leukoplakia or ivory-white skin concurrent with malignant melanoma.61, 73, 80, 82 Thus,
the absence of significant overlap between childhood and vulvar variants of
malignant melanoma would indicate that their coincidence is improbable.
Just as persistent melanocytic nevi can mimic malignant melanoma,6-9 melanocytic
nevi of genital skin can present difficulties in histologic interpretation,
leading to the misdiagnosis of malignant melanoma.14, 83-86
These "atypical" genital melanocytic nevi occur most commonly on the vulva
(labia minora and clitoral region) of young women (median age, 25 years) and
contain an underlying stroma that is different from that of dysplastic melanocytic
nevi and malignant melanoma.83 The histologic
features that overlap with malignant melanoma are (1) their wide lateral extent,
(2) lack of uniformity in sizes and shapes of melanocytes within the epidermis,
(3) confluence of some junctional melanocytes, and (4) presence of melanocytes,
both singly and in nests within adnexal structures.83-85
The discriminating features that allow for differentiation from malignant
melanoma are the presence of (1) sharp demarcation of epidermal melanocytic
component, (2) symmetry of the lesion, (3) absence of pagetoid spread, and
(4) maturation of the melanocytes, with progressive descent into the dermis.
With the exception of pagetoid spread and symmetry, vulvar LS melanocytic
nevi share the same clinical profile and the same histologic features of sharp
circumscription, confluent junctional nests, and dermal melanocyte maturation
with "atypical" genital melanocytic nevi.83
Keratinocytes and melanocytes overlying scars and LS exhibit an activated
phenotype denoted by increased proliferation and inverse expression of envelope
proteins (eg, involucrin) by keratinocytes and HMB-45 expression and increased
proliferation of melanocytes1-3,10, 87
(J.A.C., X.C.M., A.S., and R. Grabowski, MD, unpublished data, 2000). Considering
this shared keratinocytic and melanocytic response to stromal fibrosis or
sclerosis, the similarities of LS melanocytic nevi to persistent melanocytic
nevi are not unexpected. Although persistent malignant melanoma also showed
many of the same histologic and immunophenotypic features, the presence or
absence of crucial histologic features and the higher variability and greater
degree of immunophenotypic changes can distinguish malignant melanoma from
both LS melanocytic nevi and persistent melanocytic nevi (Table 3). Histologically, sharp demarcation of junctional melanocytic
hyperplasia that is limited to the area above the dermal fibrosis-sclerosis
and the presence of a residual melanocytic nevi were not features of persistent
malignant melanoma. Variable and deep dermal HMB-45 expression and significantly
greater growth fraction in the form of mitotic figures and Ki-67 antigen expression
found in this study separated persistent malignant melanoma from LS melanocytic
nevi and persistent melanocytic nevi and more closely resembled that described
for conventional malignant melanoma.88-92
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Diagnostic Features Distinguishing Lichen Sclerosus Melanocytic
Nevi and Persistent Melanocytic Nevi From Persistent (Incompletely Excised)
Malignant Melanoma
|
|
|
The finding of residual or uninvolved dermal melanocytic nevi in LS
melanocytic nevi indicates that melanocytic nevi may precede the development
of LS. However, it is possible that LS induces the formation of a melanocytic
nevus. Clinical pigmentation caused by melanocytic hyperplasia affects approximately
8% to 30% of surgical scars4-5
and may be related to production of cytokines, growth factors, neuropeptides,
changes in composition of the extracellular matrix by the pathologically altered
dermis, or disruption of the basement membrane zone.93-97
Underscoring this mesenchyme-melanocyte interaction are investigations showing
that extracellular matrix proteins modify melanocyte morphologic characteristics,
proliferation, and melanogenesis.98-99
Thus, the marked black clinical pigmentation and enlarged, melanogenic melanocytes
found in both LS melanocytic nevi and persistent melanocytic nevi would be
induced by secretorily active mesenchymal cells of the dermis surrounding
the nevoid melanocytes. Alternatively, formation of melanocytic nevi could
be induced de novo from predisposed melanocytes and activated mesenchyme and
pathologically changed extracellular matrix of LS.
It is tempting to suggest that LS could act as a cofactor in the development
of vulvar malignant melanoma through the analogy with the well-documented
phenomenon of chronic inflammation and scarring giving rise to cancer (eg,
squamous cell carcinoma secondary to long-standing scars10, 100).
For example, vulvar LS has a cumulative risk of 14.8% for the development
of squamous cell carcinoma, and the incidence of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma
increases as a function of age from 1.8 to 20 per 100 000 by age 80 years.10, 101 In the etiology of squamous cell
carcinoma, LS would act as both an initiator and a promoter of carcinogenesis
via its inflammatory infiltrate rich in macrophages producing free radicals
and the induced proliferative activity of affected keratinocytes, respectively.10, 100 Since UV radiation, the only proved
environmental "melanocytic carcinogen," does not access the vulva or vaginal
mucosa, we propose that local stressors and defective mechanisms of reestablishing
local tissue homeostasis96, 102
would initiate and/or facilitate vulvar melanoma development. Lichen sclerosus
is an example of such a condition, eg, it would generate a pro-oxidative environment,
increase the risk of mutation, and, by changing the extracellular matrix composition
and repertoire of cytokines and growth factors produced, facilitate clonal
expansion of damaged melanocytes. Moreover, dense subepidermal fibrosis-sclerosis
would provide a relative shield against T-cytotoxic T lymphocytes, allowing
for expansion of melanocytes with an abnormal phenotype. As underreporting
and lack of recognition of vulvar dermatoses in the skin adjacent to squamous
cell carcinoma have been well documented,10, 103
we expect that a similar practice is responsible for the scarcity or absence
of reports of LS adjacent to vulvar malignant melanoma. The lack of thorough
analysis of the skin associated with vulvar malignant melanoma is highlighted
by the unknown role of preexisting vulvar melanocytic nevi in its formation.
Although many series of cases of vulvar malignant melanoma report a history
of a preexisting melanocytic nevus,53-54,58, 67, 72-75,77
few series histologically document preexisting vulvar melanocytic nevi, which
has a frequency of less than 1% of all vulvar malignant melanomas.49, 55, 66 To test the above
hypothesis, future clinical and pathological reporting of vulvar malignant
melanoma should attempt to more carefully analyze the adjacent skin to document
the prevalence of coexisting inflammatory conditions (LS), melanocytic precursors,
or genital melanosis. As the development of cancer involves tumor-stroma interactions,104-106 the absence of
sclerosis underlying or adjacent to vulvar malignant melanomas (or squamous
cell carcinomas) would reflect the phenomenon of tumor progression characterized
by changes in neoplastic cells proceeding in concert with alterations in the
extracellular matrix.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that melanocytic nevi can be found superimposed on LS and
that malignant melanomas can arise in the background of LS. The high frequency
of genital involvement and restriction to females is likely a reflection of
the overwhelming predilection of LS for female genitalia.11, 18
Melanocytic nevi in LS, both clinically and histologically, can mimic malignant
melanoma and, thus, are akin to persistent melanocytic nevi or so-called pseudomelanoma.7 The overlapping morphologic features with malignant
melanoma are likely caused by the stromal alterations that may induce a change
in melanocyte phenotype. Nonetheless, key histologic features can confidently
separate LS melanocytic nevi from malignant melanomas. Malignant melanomas
exhibit poorly circumscribed junctional melanocytes that extend past dermal
changes of fibrosis-sclerosis, dermal mitotic figures, and deep HMB-45 expression.
Malignant melanomas also lack the trizonal pattern and/or a dermal melanocytic
nevi underlying the sclerosis found in LS melanocytic nevi. Although the possibility
of an aggressive course cannot be entirely excluded without longer follow-up,
the striking similarity to persistent melanocytic nevi and the absence of
recurrence in this series underscore the benign nature of LS melanocytic nevi.
Finally, regardless of a coincidental or causal relationship, LS would be
predicted to be a prevalent finding in the skin and mucosa surrounding vulvar
malignant melanomas, considering the high incidence of these 2 conditions
in older women and the well-documented underreporting of LS adjacent to vulvar
squamous cell carcinomas.10, 103
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Accepted for publication April 19, 2001.
Corresponding author: J. Andrew Carlson, MD, FRCPC, Divisions of
Dermatology and Dermatopathology, Albany Medical College, Campus Box MC-81,
Albany, NY 12208 (e-mail: CarlsoA{at}mail.amc.edu).
From the Divisions of Dermatology and Dermatopathology (Dr Carlson),
Department of Pathology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY (Drs Carlson,
Mu, and Mihm); Department of Pathology, University of Tennessee, Memphis (Dr
Slominski); Department of Dermato-Venerology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen,
Denmark (Dr Weismann); Regional Medical Laboratories, Tulsa, Okla (Dr Crowson);
Associates in Gynecologic Care, Albany (Dr Malfetano); M. D. Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Tex (Dr Prieto); and Department of Pathology, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Boston (Dr Mihm).
REFERENCES
 |  |
1. Smoller BR, McNutt NS, Hsu A. HMB-45 recognizes stimulated melanocytes. J Cutan Pathol. 1989;16:49-53.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
2. Lommel K, Tronnier M, Wolff HH. Activation of epidermal melanocytes is independent of epithelial proliferation
and vascularization: immunohistologic study using HMB-45 antibody with review
of the literature [in German]. Hautarzt. 1996;47:616-623.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
3. Smoller BR, Hsu A, Krueger J. HMB-45 monoclonal antibody recognizes an inducible and reversible melanocyte
cytoplasmic protein. J Cutan Pathol. 1991;18:315-322.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
4. Botella-Estrada R, Sanmartin O, Sevila A, Escudero A, Guillen C. Melanotic pigmentation in excision scars of melanocytic and non-melanocytic
skin tumors. J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26:137-144.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
5. Duve S, Schmoeckel C, Burgdorf WH. Melanocytic hyperplasia in scars: a histopathological investigation
of 722 cases. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996;18:236-240.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
6. Ackerman AB, Troy JL, Rosen LB, Jerasutus S, White CR, King DF. Persistent melanocytic nevus vs. persistent malignant melanoma. In: Differential Diagnosis in Dermatopathology
II. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1988:114-117.
7. Kornberg R, Ackerman AB. Pseudomelanoma: recurrent melanocytic nevus following partial surgical
removal. Arch Dermatol. 1975;111:1588-1590.
FREE FULL TEXT
8. Sexton M, Sexton CW. Recurrent pigmented melanocytic nevus: a benign lesion, not to be mistaken
for malignant melanoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;115:122-126.
ISI
| PUBMED
9. Park HK, Leonard DD, Arrington JH, Lund HZ. Recurrent melanocytic nevi: clinical and histologic review of 175 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:285-292.
ISI
| PUBMED
10. Carlson JA, Ambros R, Malfetano J, et al. Vulvar lichen sclerosus and squamous cell carcinoma: a cohort, case
control, and investigational study with historical perspective; implications
for chronic inflammation and sclerosis in the development of neoplasia. Hum Pathol. 1998;29:932-948.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
11. Carlson JA, Lamb P, Malfetano J, Ambros RA, Mihm MC Jr. Clinicopathologic comparison of vulvar and extragenital lichen sclerosus:
histologic variants, evolving lesions, and etiology of 141 cases. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:844-854.
ISI
| PUBMED
12. Egan CA, Bradley RR, Logsdon VK, Summers BK, Hunter GR, Vanderhooft SL. Vulvar melanoma in childhood. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:345-348.
FREE FULL TEXT
13. Friedman RJ, Kopf AW, Jones WB. Malignant melanoma in association with lichen sclerosus on the vulva
of a 14-year-old. Am J Dermatopathol. 1984;6(suppl 1):253-256.
14. Carlson JA, Mihm MC. Vulvar nevi, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus, and vitiligo. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:1314-1316.
15. Clemente C, Cochran AJ, Elder DE, et al. Histopathologic diagnosis of dysplastic nevi: concordance among pathologists
convened by the World Health Organization Melanoma Programme. Hum Pathol. 1991;22:313-319.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
16. Marghoob AA, Kopf AW. Persistent nevus: an exception to the ABCD rule of dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36:474-475.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
17. Cattoretti G, Becker MH, Key G, et al. Monoclonal antibodies against recombinant parts of the Ki-67 antigen
(MIB 1 and MIB 3) detect proliferating cells in microwave-processed formalin-fixed
paraffin sections. J Pathol. 1992;168:357-363.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
18. Wallace HJ. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc. 1971;57:9-30.
PUBMED
19. Powell JJ, Wojnarowska F. Lichen sclerosus. Lancet. 1999;353:1777-1783.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
20. Berth-Jones J, Graham-Brown RA, Burns DA. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus: a review of 15 cases in young girls. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1991;16:14-17.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
21. Chernosky ME, Derbes VJ, Burks JW. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in children. Arch Dermatol. 1957;75:647-652.
FREE FULL TEXT
22. Clark JA, Muller SA. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in children: a report of 24 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1967;95:476-482.
FREE FULL TEXT
23. Fischer GO. Lichen sclerosus in childhood. Australas J Dermatol. 1995;36:166-167.
PUBMED
24. Helm KF, Gibson LE, Muller SA. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in children and young adults. Pediatr Dermatol. 1991;8:97-101.
ISI
| PUBMED
25. Sahn EE, Bluestein EL, Oliva S. Familial lichen sclerosus et atrophicus in childhood. Pediatr Dermatol. 1994;11:160-163.
ISI
| PUBMED
26. Powell J, Wojnarowska F, Winsey S, Marren P, Welsh K. Lichen sclerosus premenarche: autoimmunity and immunogenetics. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142:481-484.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
27. Bader JL, Li FP, Olmstead PM, Strickman NA, Green DM. Childhood malignant melanoma: incidence and etiology. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1985;7:341-345.
ISI
| PUBMED
28. Whiteman D, Valery P, McWhirter W, Green A. Incidence of cutaneous childhood melanoma in Queensland, Australia. Int J Cancer. 1995;63:765-768.
ISI
| PUBMED
29. Weinstock MA. Malignant melanoma of the vulva and vagina in the United States: patterns
of incidence and population-based estimates of survival. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1225-1230.
ISI
| PUBMED
30. Barnhill RL. Childhood melanoma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1998;15:189-194.
ISI
| PUBMED
31. Corpron CA, Black CT, Ross MI, et al. Melanoma as a second malignant neoplasm after childhood cancer. Am J Surg. 1996;172:459-461.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
32. Crotty KA, McCarthy SW, Palmer AA, et al. Malignant melanoma in childhood: a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases
and comparison with Spitz nevi. World J Surg. 1992;16:179-185.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
33. Mehregan AH, Mehregan DA. Malignant melanoma in childhood. Cancer. 1993;71:4096-4103.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
34. Milton GW, Shaw HM, Thompson JF, McCarthy WH. Cutaneous melanoma in childhood: incidence and prognosis. Australas J Dermatol. 1997;38(suppl 1):S44-S48.
35. Roth ME, Grant-Kels JM, Kuhn MK, Greenberg RD, Hurwitz S. Melanoma in children. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:265-274.
ISI
| PUBMED
36. Scalzo DA, Hida CA, Toth G, Sober AJ, Mihm MC Jr. Childhood melanoma: a clinicopathological study of 22 cases. Melanoma Res. 1997;7:63-68.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
37. Spatz A, Avril MF. Melanoma in childhood: review and perspectives. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 1998;1:463-474.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
38. Wagner RF Jr. Childhood malignant melanoma in a patient with dysplastic nevi. Tex Med. 1992;88:72-73.
PUBMED
39. Whiteman DC, Valery P, McWhirter W, Green AC. Risk factors for childhood melanoma in Queensland, Australia. Int J Cancer. 1997;70:26-31.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
40. Wu SJ, Lambert DR. Melanoma in children and adolescents. Pediatr Dermatol. 1997;14:87-92.
ISI
| PUBMED
41. Bartoli C, Bono A, Zurrida S, et al. Childhood cutaneous melanoma. J Dermatol. 1994;21:289-293.
PUBMED
42. Davidoff AM, Cirrincione C, Seigler HF. Malignant melanoma in children. Ann Surg Oncol. 1994;1:278-282.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
43. Gibbs P, Moore A, Robinson W, Walsh P, Golitz L, Gonzalez R. Pediatric melanoma: are recent advances in the management of adult
melanoma relevant to the pediatric population? J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2000;22:428-432.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
44. Hayes FA, Green AA. Malignant melanoma in childhood: clinical course and response to chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2:1229-1234.
ABSTRACT
45. McWhirter WR, Dobson C. Childhood melanoma in Australia. World J Surg. 1995;19:334-336.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
46. Handfield-Jones SE, Smith NP. Malignant melanoma in childhood. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134:607-616.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
47. Tasseron EW, van der Esch EP, Hart AA, Brutel de la Riviere G, Aartsen EJ. A clinicopathological study of 30 melanomas of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;46:170-175.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
48. Raber G, Mempel V, Jackisch C, et al. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: report of 89 patients. Cancer. 1996;78:2353-2358.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
49. Ragnarsson-Olding BK, Kanter-Lewensohn LR, Lagerlof B, Nilsson BR, Ringborg UK. Malignant melanoma of the vulva in a nationwide, 25-year study of 219
Swedish females: clinical observations and histopathologic features. Cancer. 1999;86:1273-1284.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
50. Ragnarsson-Olding B, Johansson H, Rutqvist LE, Ringborg U. Malignant melanoma of the vulva and vagina: trends in incidence, age
distribution, and long-term survival among 245 consecutive cases in Sweden
1960-1984. Cancer. 1993;71:1893-1897.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
51. Creasman WT, Phillips JL, Menck HR. A survey of hospital management practices for vulvar melanoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188:670-675.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
52. Pack GT, Oropeza R. A comparative study of melanomas and epidermoid carcinomas of the vulva:
a review of 44 melanomas and 58 epidermoid carcinomas (1930-1965). Rev Surg. 1967;24:305-324.
PUBMED
53. Trimble EL, Lewis JL Jr, Williams LL, et al. Management of vulvar melanoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;45:254-258.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
54. Woolcott RJ, Henry RJ, Houghton CR. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: Australian experience. J Reprod Med. 1988;33:699-702.
ISI
| PUBMED
55. Blessing K, Kernohan NM, Miller ID, Al Nafussi AL. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: clinicopathogical features. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1991;1:81-87.
56. Bradgate MG, Rollason TP, McConkey CC, Powell J. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: a clinicopathological study of 50
women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:124-133.
ISI
| PUBMED
57. Heller DS, Moomjy M, Koulos J, Smith D. Vulvar and vaginal melanoma: a clinicopathologic study. J Reprod Med. 1994;39:945-948.
ISI
| PUBMED
58. Larsson KB, Shaw HM, Thompson JF, Harman RC, McCarthy WH. Primary mucosal and glans penis melanomas: the Sydney Melanoma Unit
experience. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:121-126.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
59. Look KY, Roth LM, Sutton GP. Vulvar melanoma reconsidered. Cancer. 1993;72:143-146.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
60. Phillips GL, Bundy BN, Okagaki T, Kucera PR, Stehman FB. Malignant melanoma of the vulva treated by radical hemivulvectomy:
a prospective study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cancer. 1994;73:2626-2632.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
61. Piura B, Egan M, Lopes A, Monaghan JM. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: a clinicopathologic study of 18 cases. J Surg Oncol. 1992;50:234-240.
ISI
| PUBMED
62. Piura B, Rabinovich A, Dgani R. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: report of six cases and review of
the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1999;20:182-186.
ISI
| PUBMED
63. Scheistroen M, Trope C, Koern J, Pettersen EO, Abeler VM, Kristensen GB. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: evaluation of prognostic factors with
emphasis on DNA ploidy in 75 patients. Cancer. 1995;75:72-80.
FULL TEXT
| PUBMED
64. Vavra N, Seifert M, Czerwenka K, Pehamberger H, Kucera H, Weghaupt K. Melanoma of the vulva: report of 12 cases [in German]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991;51:379-382.
PUBMED
65. Benda JA, Platz CE, Anderson B. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: a clinical-pathologic review of 16
cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1986;5:202-216.
ISI
| PUBMED
66. Jaramillo BA, Ganjei P, Averette HE, Sevin BU, Lovecchio JL. Malignant melanoma of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66:398-401.
ISI
| PUBMED
67. Podratz KC, Gaffey TA, Symmonds RE, Johansen KL, O'Brien PC. Melanoma of the vulva: an update. Gynecol Oncol. 1983;16:153-168.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
68. Stefanon B, Clemente C, Lupi G, et al. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: a clinicopathologic study of 28 cases. Cervix. 1987;5:223-237.
69. Bouma J, Weening JJ, Elders A. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: report of 18 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1982;13:237-251.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
70. Bozzetti F, Cascinelli N, Cataldo I, Lupi G. Prognosis of melanoma of the vulva [in Italian]. Tumori. 1975;61:393-399.
ISI
| PUBMED
71. Cascinelli N, Di Re F, Lupi G, Balzarini GP. Malignant melanoma of the vulva. Tumori. 1970;56:345-352.
ISI
| PUBMED
72. Chung AF, Woodruff JM, Lewis JL Jr. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: a report of 44 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1975;45:638-646.
ISI
| PUBMED
73. Das Gupta T, D'Urso J. Melanoma of the female genitalia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964;119:1074-1079.
74. Edington PT, Monaghan JM. Malignant melanoma of the vulva and vagina. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:422-424.
ISI
| PUBMED
75. Iversen K, Robins RE. Mucosal malignant melanomas. Am J Surg. 1980;139:660-664.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
76. Karlen JR, Piver MS, Barlow JJ. Melanoma of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol. 1975;45:181-185.
ISI
| PUBMED
77. Morrow CP, Rutledge FN. Melanoma of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol. 1972;39:745-752.
ISI
| PUBMED
78. Phillips GL, Twiggs LB, Okagaki T. Vulvar melanoma: a microstaging study. Gynecol Oncol. 1982;14:80-88.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
79. Ragni MV, Tobon H. Primary malignant melanoma of the vagina and vulva. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;43:658-664.
ISI
| PUBMED
80. Yackel DB, Symmonds RE, Kempers RD. Melanoma of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol. 1970;35:625-631.
ISI
| PUBMED
81. Janovski NA, Marshall D, Taki I. Malignant melanoma of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962;84:523-536.
82. Ulmer A, Dietl J, Schaumburg-Lever G, Fierlbeck G. Amelanotic malignant melanoma of the vulva: case report and review
of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1996;259:45-50.
ISI
| PUBMED
83. Clark WH Jr, Hood AF, Tucker MA, Jampel RM. Atypical melanocytic nevi of the genital type with a discussion of
reciprocal parenchymal-stromal interactions in the biology of neoplasia. Hum Pathol. 1998;29(1, suppl 1):S1-S24.
84. Christensen WN, Friedman KJ, Woodruff JD, Hood AF. Histologic characteristics of vulvar nevocellular nevi. J Cutan Pathol. 1987;14:87-91.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
85. Friedman RJ, Ackerman AB. Difficulties in the histologic diagnosis of melanocytic nevi on the
vulvae of premenopausal women. In: Pathology of Malignant Melanoma. New
York, NY: Masson; 1981:119-127.
86. Rock B, Hood AF, Rock JA. Prospective study of vulvar nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:104-106.
ISI
| PUBMED
87. Smoller BR, Krueger J, McNutt NS, Hsu A. "Activated" keratinocyte phenotype is unifying feature in conditions
which predispose to squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Mod Pathol. 1990;3:171-175.
ISI
| PUBMED
88. Skelton HG, Smith KJ, Barrett TL, Lupton GP, Graham JH. HMB-45 staining in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions: a reflection
of cellular activation. Am J Dermatopathol. 1991;13:543-550.
ISI
| PUBMED
89. Rudolph P, Lappe T, Schubert C, Schmidt D, Parwaresch RM, Christophers E. Diagnostic assessment of two novel proliferation-specific antigens
in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:1615-1625.
ABSTRACT
90. Tran TA, Ross JS, Carlson JA, Mihm MC Jr. Mitotic cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases in melanocytic lesions. Hum Pathol. 1998;29:1085-1090.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
91. Smoller BR, McNutt NS, Hsu A. HMB-45 staining of dysplastic nevi: support for a spectrum of progression
toward melanoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13:680-684.
ISI
| PUBMED
92. McNutt NS, Urmacher C, Hakimian J, Hoss DM, Lugo J. Nevoid malignant melanoma: morphologic patterns and immunohistochemical
reactivity. J Cutan Pathol. 1995;22:502-517.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
93. Carlson JA, Slominski A, Heasley D, Mihm MC Jr, Toda S. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans can induce epidermal hyperplasia that
is inversely related to its proximity to the epidermis. Am J Dermatopathol. 1998;20:428-430.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
94. Requena L, Sanchez-Yus E, Simon P, del Rio E. Induction of cutaneous hyperplasias by altered stroma. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996;18:248-268.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
95. Toda S, Heasley DD, Carlson JA, Mihm MC Jr. Lentiginous melanocytic hyperplasia overlying dermatofibroma. J Dermatol. 1996;23:840-844.
PUBMED
96. Slominski A, Wortsman J, Luger T, Paus R, Solomon S. Corticotropin releasing hormone and propiomelanocortin involvement
in the cutaneous response to stress. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:979-1020.
FREE FULL TEXT
97. Hoss DM, McNutt NS, Carter DM, Rothaus KO, Kenet BJ, Lin AN. Atypical melanocytic lesions in epidermolysis bullosa. J Cutan Pathol. 1994;21:164-169.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
98. Hedley S, Gawkrodger DJ, Weetman AP, MacNeil S. Investigation of the influence of extracellular matrix proteins on
normal human melanocyte morphology and melanogenic activity. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135:888-897.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
99. Hedley SJ, Wagner M, Bielby S, Smith-Thomas L, Gawkrodger DJ, MacNeil S. The influence of extracellular matrix proteins on cutaneous and uveal
melanocytes. Pigment Cell Res. 1997;10:54-59.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
100. Carlson JA, Grabowski R, Chichester P, Paunovich E, Malfetano J. Comparative immunophenotypic study of lichen sclerosus: epidermotropic
CD57+ lymphocytes are numerousimplications for pathogenesis. Am J Dermatopathol. 2000;22:7-16.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
101. Carli P, Cattaneo A, De Magnis A, Biggeri A, Taddei G, Giannotti B. Squamous cell carcinoma arising in vulval lichen sclerosus: a longitudinal
cohort study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1995;4:491-495.
ISI
| PUBMED
102. Slominski A, Wortsman J. Neuroendocrinology of the skin. Endocr Rev. 2000;21:457-487.
FREE FULL TEXT
103. Zaki I, Dalziel KL, Solomonsz FA, Stevens A. The under-reporting of skin disease in association with squamous cell
carcinoma of the vulva. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1996;21:334-337.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
104. Cunha GR, Hayashi N, Wong YC. Regulation of differentiation and growth of normal adult and neoplastic
epithelia by inductive mesenchyme. Cancer Surv. 1991;11:73-90.
ISI
| PUBMED
105. Coussens LM, Hanahan D, Arbeit JM. Genetic predisposition and parameters of malignant progression in K14-HPV16
transgenic mice. Am J Pathol. 1996;149:1899-1917.
ABSTRACT
106. Clark WH Jr, Tucker MA, Goldstein AM. Parenchymal-stromal interactions in neoplasia: theoretical considerations
and observations in melanocytic neoplasia. Acta Oncol. 1995;34:749-757.
ISI
| PUBMED
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Dermatology Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(1):139.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Epidermolysis Bullosa Nevus: An Exception to the Clinical and Dermoscopic Criteria for Melanoma
Cash et al.
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:1164-1167.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Mucinous metaplasia of the vulva in a case of lichen sclerosus. A case report
Rakha et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2005;58:1217-1218.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|