You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 9, September 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Study
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Dermatologic Disorders, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nodular Amyloidosis

Review and Long-term Follow-up of 16 Cases

Alison O. Moon, MD; Kenneth T. Calamia, MD; John S. Walsh, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1157-1159.

ABSTRACT

Objectives  To review the clinical presentations of nodular amyloidosis, examine these cases for evidence of plasma cell monoclonality, and obtain long-term follow-up data on progression to systemic amyloidosis.

Design  Retrospective case series with long-term follow-up data obtained by phone survey.

Setting  Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, and Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla.

Patients  All patients diagnosed with nodular amyloidosis between 1971 and 2001.

Main Outcome Measures  Clinical records and histopathologic characteristics were reviewed. Polymerase chain reaction to assess immunoglobulin gene rearrangement and immunohistochemical analysis to detect {kappa} and {lambda} light chain restriction were performed on paraffin-embedded specimens. Patients were contacted by phone to determine if progression to systemic disease had occurred.

Results  We identified 16 patients with nodular amyloidosis. Mean age at diagnosis was 60.8 years (range, 41-87 years). Eight (50%) of 16 patients had acral involvement. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated light chain restriction in 6 of 10 patients. At the time of diagnosis, no patient was known to have systemic amyloidosis. One patient, however, had a serum monoclonal {lambda} protein and died 4 years later secondary to systemic amyloidosis. Follow-up data were obtained in 14 of the remaining 15 patients, with a mean follow-up time of 10 years (range, 8 months to 24 years). None of the 14 patients had signs or symptoms suggesting progression to systemic amyloidosis.

Conclusions  Nodular amyloidosis affects both sexes during middle age, with a tendency to affect acral sites. The relatively high rate of light chain restriction in our series provides further evidence for the presence of a local plasma cell clone. Progression to systemic amyloidosis is uncommon.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

PRIMARY CUTANEOUS amyloidosis refers to amyloidosis involving the skin with no evidence of systemic involvement. It most commonly takes the form of either macular or lichen amyloidosis, in which the amyloid protein in the superficial dermis is composed of altered keratin filaments derived from degenerated keratinocytes.1 In the less common nodular amyloidosis (primary nodular cutaneous amyloidosis), the amyloid is derived from immunoglobulin light chains (AL protein) produced by local plasma cells. Systemic amyloidosis may be associated with a number of types of skin lesions, including nodular lesions, which may be clinically and histologically identical to those seen in primary nodular cutaneous amyloidosis. Progression of nodular amyloidosis to systemic amyloidosis has been reported to occur in 7% to 50% of patients.2-3 Our goal was to review the clinical presentations of patients with nodular amyloidosis, examine these cases for evidence of plasma cell monoclonality, and obtain long-term follow-up data on progression to systemic disease.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Patients with biopsy-proven nodular amyloidosis seen between January 1971 and February 2001 were identified by accessing computer-generated master diagnosis lists, dermatopathology records, and surgical databases. The clinical records and available histopathologic findings were reviewed. Immunohistochemical stainings for {kappa} and {lambda} light chains as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses for immunoglobulin gene rearrangement were performed on sections obtained from available paraffin blocks. Patients (or if deceased, their spouses or first-degree relatives) were contacted by phone survey in October 2001 to determine if progression to systemic disease had occurred. The institutional review board of the Mayo Foundation approved this study.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Of the 16 patients identified (Table 1), there were 9 women and 7 men. The mean age at diagnosis was 60.8 years (range, 41-87 years), and the mean duration of the lesions before diagnosis was 13.5 years (range, 6 months to 30 years). There was a tendency for acral involvement, with lesions occurring on the feet, nose, or periauricular area in 8 of 16 patients (Figure 1 and Figure 2). No patient had a family history of amyloidosis. Two patients had Sjögren syndrome, 2 patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 3 patients had liver disease (1 case each of Gilbert syndrome, primary biliary cirrhosis, and steatohepatitis of unknown cause). Of 10 patients with paraffin blocks available, 4 demonstrated a {kappa} light chain restriction and 2 showed a {lambda} light chain restriction, suggesting local plasma cell clonality (Figure 3 and Figure 4). PCR analysis for immunoglobulin gene rearrangement performed on the same 10 available paraffin blocks showed no amplifiable DNA in 7 of 10 patients despite adequate controls. In the remaining 3 patients, the PCR results were technically suboptimal because the control primer failed to amplify.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Clinical and Laboratory Data and Follow-up Period of Study Patients




View larger version (186K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Preauricular waxy plaque of nodular amyloidosis.




View larger version (265K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Histopathologic photomicrograph showing nodular amyloidosis (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x40).




View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Positive staining for {kappa} light chains ({kappa} light chain immunoperoxidase, original magnification x200).




View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Negative staining for {lambda} light chains ({lambda} light chain immunoperoxidase, original magnification x200; same field as Figure 3).


At the time of initial skin biopsy, 1 patient was noted to have a serum monoclonal IgG{lambda} protein, but she was not extensively evaluated for the possibility of systemic amyloidosis. She developed the first symptoms (edema, dyspnea, and fatigue) of systemic amyloidosis within the following year. She subsequently died, at age 90 years, 5 months after a lung biopsy confirmed interstitial amyloidosis. Results of telephone surveys of the remaining 15 patients revealed that 14 had no diagnosis or symptoms suggesting progression to systemic disease after a mean follow-up of 10 years (range, 8 months to 24 years). One patient was lost to follow-up.


COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

We identified 16 cases of nodular amyloidosis. The disorder affected both sexes in middle age to late adulthood, with a predilection for acral sites. Two of our patients had Sjögren syndrome. A possible association of nodular amyloidosis and Sjögren syndrome has been reported.4 The presence of light chain restriction in our series provides further evidence for a monoclonal population of plasma cells producing the amyloid protein. The negative PCR finding for immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in 7 of the 10 specimens with adequate controls may be the consequence of too few plasma cells present to extract a sufficient amount of DNA to amplify a clone. Although plasma cell monoclonality using PCR on paraffin-embedded sections has been reported, the sensitivity of PCR on paraffin-embedded tissue is unknown.5-7

In our follow-up study, diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis occurred within 1 year in a single patient who had a monoclonal protein in the serum at the time of her skin biopsy. This patient may have had unrecognized systemic amyloidosis from the onset. In 14 other patients, there was no progression to systemic disease.

Serum amyloid P component is a normal circulating plasma protein that binds specifically to amyloid fibrils.8 Scintigraphy with iodine 123–labeled serum amyloid P component may be useful in monitoring patients with nodular amyloidosis and a monoclonal gammopathy for early occult systemic amyloidosis.9

In another case series of nodular amyloidosis with long-term follow-up, 1 patient of 15 developed a trace IgG{kappa} paraproteinemia 5 years after his initial diagnosis of nodular amyloidosis with a negative serum protein electrophoresis finding.3 He eventually developed biopsy-proven amyloid nodules of the larynx with possible cardiac involvement as well. In a 1970 study by Brownstein and Helwig,2 5 of 10 patients who initially appeared to have localized "tumefactive" or nodular amyloidosis were subsequently found to have evidence of systemic amyloidosis. Unfortunately, no details regarding initial laboratory investigations or follow-up periods were provided. Our experience suggests that the progression of nodular amyloidosis to systemic amyloidosis is uncommon, particularly if no clinical or laboratory evidence for systemic disease exists at the time of diagnosis.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Corresponding author and reprints: John S. Walsh, MD, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224 (e-mail: walsh.john{at}mayo.edu).

Accepted for publication March 19, 2003.

From the Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Huilgol SC, Ramnarain N, Carrington P, Leigh IM, Black MM. Cytokeratins in primary cutaneous amyloidosis. Australas J Dermatol. 1998;39:81-85. PUBMED
2. Brownstein MH, Helwig EB. The cutaneous amyloidoses, I: localized forms. Arch Dermatol. 1970;102:8-19. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Woollons A, Black MM. Nodular localized primary cutaneous amyloidosis: a long-term follow-up study. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145:105-109. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
4. Inazumi T, Hakuno M, Yamada H, et al. Characterization of the amyloid fibril from primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis associated with Sjogren's syndrome. Dermatology. 1994;189:125-128. PUBMED
5. Hagari Y, Mihara M, Hagari S. Nodular localized cutaneous amyloidosis. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135:630-633. PUBMED
6. Hagari Y, Mihara M, Konohana I, Ueki H, Yamamoto O, Koizumi H. Nodular localized cutaneous amyloidosis. Br J Dermatol. 1998;138:652-654. PUBMED
7. Setoguchi M, Hoshii Y, Kawano H, Ishihara T. Analysis of plasma cell clonality in localized AL amyloidosis. Amyloid. 2000;7:41-45. PUBMED
8. Pepys MB, Dyck RF, de Beer FC, Skinner M, Cohen AS. Binding of serum amyloid P component (SAP) by amyloid fibrils. Clin Exp Immunol. 1979;38:284-293. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
9. Hawkins PN, Lavender JP, Pepys MB. Evaluation of systemic amyloidosis by scintigraphy with 123I-labeled serum amyloid P component. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:508-513. ABSTRACT


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Papules and Plaques on the Nose--Diagnosis
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:535-540.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.