You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 7, July 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Observation
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Dermatologic Disorders, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Poor Prognosis of Arthritis-Associated Pyoderma Gangrenosum

Carlos A. Charles, MD; Tracy L. Bialy, MD, MPH; Anna F. Falabella, MD; William H. Eaglstein, MD; Francisco A. Kerdel, MD; Robert S. Kirsner, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:861-864.

ABSTRACT

Background  The association between pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) and arthritis is well established. We have observed a refractory population of patients with arthritis-associated PG (PGA). We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that differences exist in response to treatment in patients with PGA compared with patients with PG without arthritis.

Observations  We performed a review of patients with PG during a 2-year period. Patients had noninfectious chronic ulcerations clinically typical for PG, exclusion of relevant differential diagnoses, and consistent histopathological features. Outcomes compared between patients with arthritis (PGA) and without arthritis (PG) included complete healing, percentage change in wound size, and duration of therapy. Of 10 PG ulcers, 7 healed, compared with 2 of 8 PGA ulcers. There was a greater mean percentage decrease in wound size in the PG vs the PGA ulcers (78.9% vs 23.4%; P = .10) and a shorter mean duration of treatment (8.7 vs 14.8 months; P = .18).

Conclusions  The ulcers of patients with PGA seem more refractory to treatment than the ulcers of patients with PG alone. Those with PGA ulcers represent a refractory subset of patients, and the ulcers are possibly secondary to unique pathophysiological features.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

PYODERMA GANGRENOSUM (PG) is a rare ulcerating inflammatory skin disease of unknown cause.1 Lesions may be solitary or multiple, with the most common site involving the lower extremity.2 This destructive disease of the skin most commonly affects young to middle-aged adults, and women are more frequently affected than men. The diagnosis of PG is based on clinicopathological findings consistent with the condition and the exclusion of other disorders that mimic the clinical disease, such as bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial infections, collagen vascular diseases, and various vasculitides.3

Pyoderma gangrenosum may occur as an idiopathic disease confined to the skin in 40% to 50% of patients. Approximately 50% of patients with PG have an associated systemic disease.4 In the 60 years since PG was first defined as a clinical entity, many associated conditions have been described, including inflammatory bowel disease,5 neoplastic disease,6 and arthritis.7 The association between PG and arthritis has been well established by reports8 showing up to 37% of PG patients with arthritis-associated PG (PGA). The arthritis associated with PG has been seropositive and seronegative. The details regarding the clinical pattern of joint inflammation are variable, but the most common presentation is large-joint seronegative monoarticular arthritis.

We have observed that patients with PGA seemed to respond poorly to treatment when compared with patients with PG alone. Accordingly, we performed a retrospective review to compare a series of patients with PG alone with those with PGA. We compared the response to treatment in patients with PG and PGA. We tested the hypothesis that a difference exists in the response time to heal or in the ability to significantly reduce the size of the PG ulcers between patients with PG and those with PGA.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

After institutional review board approval, a review was performed of the records of all patients examined and treated at the University of Miami Wound Clinic, Miami, during a 2-year period (December 1, 1998–December 1, 2000). All patients included met the clinicopathological criteria for lower extremity PG. These include clinical criteria (painful ulceration, an undermined border, surrounding erythema, a purulent base, and rapid onset and enlargement) and histologic criteria (epidermal necrosis/ulceration, superficial dermal edema, and a dense, neutrophilic, and mixed dermal/subcutaneous infiltrate). Patients had noninfectious chronic ulcerations clinically typical for PG and the exclusion of relevant differential diagnoses through biopsy, tissue culture, and appropriate laboratory studies. If a patient had multiple ulcers, the target lesion was defined as the largest ulcer. Treatment measures other than prednisone included cyclosporine, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide, minocycline, doxycycline, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, oral tacrolimus, and colchicine (Table 1). Outcomes compared between patients with PG and those with PGA included complete healing, percentage change in wound size, and duration of therapy. Arthritis was defined as one or more of the following findings: rheumatoid factor positive, physical findings of arthritis, or arthritis by medical history. Percentage change in wound size was defined as follows: (ulcer sizeb ulcer sizef)/(sizeb x 100). In the equation, b is baseline; and f, final. Statistical methods included paired t tests and the signed rank test.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Number of Patients Treated With a Specified Modality



RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria for PG and were included in our study. Of the 18 patients, 8 had PGA and the other 10 had PG not associated with arthritis. Patients were seen and followed up for a mean of 12.1 months (SD, 9.6 months), with a range of 1 to 24 months. For consistency of comparison, only patients treated for ulcers located on their lower extremities were enrolled. Patients with PGA were similar to patients with PG alone with regard to age, race, sex, size of the ulcer pretreatment, and histologic features (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Demographic Characteristics and Ulcer Sizes of the 2 Groups*


We found differences between the treatment response of the 2 groups. Of the 10 PG ulcers, 7 healed, compared with 2 of the 8 PGA ulcers (Figure 1). While the ulcer size between groups was similar before treatment, the PG ulcers were significantly smaller than the PGA ulcers after treatment. In addition, the mean ulcer size after treatment was significantly smaller in the PG patients (P = .01), while PGA ulcers did not demonstrate a significant (P = .54) response (Figure 2). The mean duration of treatment was shorter in the PG group compared with the PGA group, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .18) (Figure 3). Because a reduction in wound size represents a good prognostic factor for other long-term wounds, such as venous ulcers,9 we compared ulcers that decreased by greater than 50% during the treatment period. We found that 8 of the 10 PG ulcers decreased by greater than 50%, compared with 3 of the 8 PGA ulcers (Figure 4).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Response to treatment: 7 of 10 pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) ulcers healed compared with 2 of 8 arthritis-associated PG (PGA) ulcers.




View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Mean difference in ulcer size before and after treatment: ulcer size after treatment was smaller in the patients with pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) (P = .01), while the arthritis-associated PG (PGA) ulcers did not demonstrate a significant (P = .54) response.




View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Mean treatment duration for groups: although not statistically significant (P = .18), the mean duration of treatment was shorter in the pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) group compared with the arthritis-associated PG (PGA) group.




View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Decrease in wound size by 50% or less or greater than 50%: 8 of 10 pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) ulcers decreased by greater than 50% compared with 3 of 8 arthritis-associated PG (PGA) ulcers.



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

We describe a refractory subset of patients with PGA. The association between PG and arthritis is well established, and has included various types of arthritis. Classic seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA); an unusual, progressive, erosive, seronegative arthritis that is not associated with HLA-B27, psoriasis, or Reiter syndrome; and a seronegative arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease have all been associated with PG.7 Also, seronegative HLA-B27–positive spondyloarthropathies have been reported in association with PG.10 In the 18 patients studied retrospectively in this report, 10 had PG alone while 8 presented with PGA. Although other series8 have described up to 37% of patients with PG being associated with arthritis, the large percentage of PGA patients in the present series may be because of a referral bias inherent to our university-based clinic, due to either a more difficult to diagnose or a more refractory subset of patients.

To better compare outcomes, we compared ulcers in patients with PG and PGA that occurred on the lower extremities. Pyoderma gangrenosum commonly presents on the lower extremities,4 and patients with RA are also predisposed to developing leg ulcerations.11 Several possible explanations may account for why patients with PGA represent a more refractory subset. Concomitant disease present in patients with PGA may be partially to blame. The presence of decreased ankle range of motion in patients with arthritis, in general, is associated with venous insufficiency,12 the most common cause of chronic leg ulcers. Alternatively, patients with PGA may have distinct pathophysiological features. The basis of the lower leg predilection for ulceration of PG- and RA-associated ulcers has not been completely elucidated; however, there are several identifiable factors present in patients with RA that may lead to this phenomenon. Factors such as skin fragility, arterial disease, peripheral edema, nutritional status, and, most important, venous insufficiency may all predispose patients with RA to leg ulcerations.

Patients with arthritis are at an increased risk for developing venous insufficiency because of their immobility, impaired fibrinolysis,13 and poor calf muscle pump function due to ankle arthritis and muscle atrophy.12 In fact, a study by McRorie et al14 assessed the venous function, arterial pressures, and range of ankle movement in 23 patients with RA with a leg ulcer, and compared the results with those in the nonulcerated contralateral limb and in 25 patients with RA matched for age and duration of arthritis. They found evidence of venous insufficiency in the patients with RA and ulcer compared with control subjects. In addition, ankle movement was more restricted in the ulcerated limb compared with the nonulcerated contralateral limb. There was no difference in large-vessel arterial function between groups. These findings suggest that venous insufficiency may play a fundamental role in the development and progression of leg ulcers for patients with RA, and may play a critical role in the refractory nature of leg ulcers for PGA patients.

Because the differential diagnosis of PG is expansive, it remains possible that in the setting of concomitant seronegative or seropositive arthritis, the inflammatory process associated with arthritis may be causal in these patients' ulcers, representing a unique entity. In addition, a combination of factors, including PG and arthritis, may also be at play. Interestingly, cutaneous ulcerations secondary to arthritis are known to be particularly resistant to treatment and associated with a great deal of morbidity.15

While this report demonstrates the refractory nature of PGA ulcers, there are inherent limitations to this case study. First, only 18 patients met the inclusion criteria and were studied. Second, as previously stated, the patients studied in this report were all taken from a referral-based university wound care center.

In conclusion, we describe a refractory subset of patients with PGA. This may be either related to concomitant disease or possibly secondary to unique pathophysiological features.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Correspondence: Robert S. Kirsner, MD, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine/Veterans Administration Medical Center, 1201 NW 16th St, Miami, FL 33125 (Rkirsner{at}med.miami.edu).

Accepted for publication August 29, 2003.

This study was partially supported by the Dermatology Foundation of South Florida, Miami.

From the Departments of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery (Drs Charles, Falabella, Eaglstein, Kerdel, and Kirsner) and Epidemiology and Public Health (Dr Kirsner), University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla; the Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Bialy); and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami (Drs Charles, Falabella, and Kirsner). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Callen JP. Pyoderma gangrenosum and related disorders. Med Clin North Am. 1989;73:1247-1261. ISI | PUBMED
2. Bennett ML, Jackson JM, Jorizzo JL, Fleischer AB Jr, White WL, Callen JP. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a comparison of typical and atypical forms with an emphasis on time to remission: case review of 86 patients from 2 institutions. Medicine (Baltimore). 2000;79:37-46. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
3. Trent JT, Kirsner RS. Diagnosing pyoderma gangrenosum. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001;14:151-153. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
4. von den Driesch P. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a report of 44 cases with follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:1000-1005. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
5. Ljung T, Staun M, Grove O, Fausa O, Vatn MH, Hellstrom PM. Pyoderma gangrenosum associated with Crohn disease: effect of TNF-{alpha} blockade with infliximab. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:1108-1110. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
6. Rogalski C, Paasch U, Glander HJ, Haustein UF. Bullous pyoderma gangrenosum complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation with subsequent myelodysplastic syndrome (chronic myelomonocytic leukemia). J Dermatol. 2003;30:59-63. ISI | PUBMED
7. Holt PJ, Davies MG, Saunders KC, Nuki G. Pyoderma gangrenosum: clinical and laboratory findings in 15 patients with special reference to polyarthritis. Medicine (Baltimore). 1980;59:114-133. PUBMED
8. Powell FC, Schroeter AL, Su WP, Perry HO. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a review of 86 patients. Q J Med. 1985;55:173-186.
9. Tallman P, Muscare E, Carson P, Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. Initial rate of healing predicts complete healing of venous ulcers. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:1231-1234. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Oliveria I, Costa AM, Cantini F, et al. Pyoderma gangrenosum in association with undifferentiated seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1062-1065. ISI | PUBMED
11. Thurtle OA, Cawley MI. The frequency of leg ulceration in rheumatoid arthritis: a survey. J Rheumatol. 1983;10:507-509. ISI | PUBMED
12. Gaylarde PM, Dodd HJ, Sarkany I. Venous leg ulcers and arthropathy. Br J Rheumatol. 1990;29:142-144. FREE FULL TEXT
13. Belch JJ, McArdle B, Madhok R, et al. Decreased plasma fibrinolysis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984;43:774-777. FREE FULL TEXT
14. McRorie ER, Ruckley CV, Nuki G. The relevance of large-vessel vascular disease and restricted ankle movement to the aetiology of leg ulceration in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37:1295-1298. FREE FULL TEXT
15. Negus D, Friedgood A. The effective management of venous ulceration. Br J Surg. 1983;70:623-627. ISI | PUBMED


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Perhaps a Poorer Prognosis When Patient Has Arthritis
Journal Watch Dermatology 2004;2004:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Perhaps a Poorer Prognosis When Patient Has Arthritis
Journal Watch Dermatology 2004;2004:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.