This Article  • Abstract  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on ISI (19)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Review  • Nevi  • Alert me on articles by topic

Rudolf Happle, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:385-388.

ABSTRACT
Objective  To provide a new comprehensible and practicable classification by use of descriptive terms to distinguish the various types of phacomatosis pigmentovascularis (PPV), which has previously been classified by numbers and letters that are difficult to memorize.

Study Selection  Published case reports on PPV were reassessed.

Data Extraction and Data Synthesis  A critical review revealed that only 3 well-established types of PPV so far exist. To eliminate the cumbersome traditional classification by numbering and lettering, the following new terms are proposed: phacomatosis cesioflammea (blue spots [caesius = bluish gray] and nevus flammeus); phacomatosis spilorosea (nevus spilus coexisting with a pale-pink telangiectatic nevus), and phacomatosis cesiomarmorata (blue spots and cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita). Phacomatosis cesioflammea is identical with the traditional types IIa and IIb; phacomatosis spilorosea corresponds to types IIIa and IIIb; and phacomatosis cesiomarmorata is a descriptive term for type V. A categorical distinction of cases with and without extracutaneous anomalies seems inappropriate. The traditional type I does not exist, and the extremely rare traditional type IV is now included in the group of unclassifiable forms.

Conclusion  The proposed new classification of PPV by using 3 descriptive terms may be easier to memorize compared with the time-honored grouping of in part not even existing subtypes by numbers and letters.

INTRODUCTION

Jump to Section  • Top  • Introduction  •  • Author information  • References

Phacomatosis pigmentovascularis (PPV) is defined as an association of a widespread vascular nevus with an extensive pigmentary nevus.¹ All types so far described can be best explained as examples of twin spotting.^2-3 The prevailing classification of the various forms of PPV¹ is cumbersome. How can the busy practitioner memorize the differences between type IIb and type IIIa? A recently recognized type V^4-5 still adds to the confusion because there is no mnemonic value in the bare numbering and lettering of subtypes.

I propose a simplified classification by using descriptive terms. Accordingly, there are only 3 distinct types of PPV, apart from a group of unclassifiable forms. The 3 well-established forms are called phacomatosis cesioflammea, phacomatosis spilorosea, and phacomatosis cesiomarmorata (Table).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window] Table. Proposed New Classification of Phacomatosis Pigmentovascularis

The Greek word phakos means nevus. The term phacomatosis was originally used to characterize some neurocutaneous syndromes but is today mainly applied to genetically determined diseases characterized by the presence of 2 or more different nevi, such as "phacomatosis pigmentovascularis" or "phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica."⁶ The spelling "phacomatosis" is preferable to "phakomatosis" when the term is followed by a Latin adjective.

Jump to Section  • Top  • Introduction  •  • Author information  • References

PHACOMATOSIS CESIOFLAMMEA

This type is characterized by a coexistence of 1 or more aberrant blue spots (Mongolian spots, dermal melanocytosis) and 1 or more port-wine stains (Figure 1). The Latin word caesius means bluish gray and serves as an equivalent of the term fuscocoeroleus to describe an aberrant Mongolian spot. Phacomatosis cesioflammea is the most frequently occurring type. For example, Vidaurri-de la Cruz and colleagues⁷ did not find any other type in a series of 24 consecutive cases of PPV.

View larger version (90K): [in this window] [in a new window] Figure 1. Phacomatosis cesioflammea: blue spots coexisting with port-wine stains (courtesy of Ramón Ruiz-Maldonado, MD National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico City, Mexico).

The vascular nevus is usually purple-red and represents a nevus flammeus in the strict sense of the word. It should be noted, however, that during the first weeks of life, this port-wine stain may still show a pale-pink color.⁸

The 2 skin lesions may occur without other anomalies,⁹ or they may be associated with central nervous system defects,¹⁰ ocular anomalies such as melanosis bulbi or glaucoma,⁷ asymmetrical length of limbs,^11-12 dysplastic veins or lymph vessels,^{7, 13} or nevus anemicus.^14-15

PHACOMATOSIS SPILOROSEA

This type of PPV is characterized by the coexistence of nevus spilus (speckled lentiginous nevus) of a macular type and a telangiectatic nevus, which usually appears, throughout life as a pale-pink color like that of a salmon patch and unlike the purple hue of nevus flammeus (port-wine stain) (Figure 2).^{2, 16-17}

View larger version (63K): [in this window] [in a new window] Figure 2. Phacomatosis spilorosea: nevus spilus (speckled lentiginous nevus) associated with a pale-pink telangiectatic nevus (reprinted with permission from Hautarzt.2 Copyright 1989, Springer-Verlag GmbH & Co KG).

Hence, the present classification implies that 2 different types of lateral telangiectatic nevi exist, which are both associated with a specific type of PPV. It should be noted that authors who have reported cases of PPV have not discriminated between these 2 types of vascular nevi buthave confusingly and interchangeably used the term nevus flammeus in all patients.^16-19 It is important to realize that the name nevus flammeus (port-wine stain) does not apply to the rosé-wine nevus as observed in phacomatosis spilorosea. The term capillary malformation²⁰ is likewise unsuitable because it does not differentiate between nevus flammeus and other types of vascular nevi.

The term spilus is a short Latin word to describe speckled lentiginous nevus. The name phacomatosis spilorosea is proposed because roseus means light red or pink. The disorder may occur without other anomalies,¹⁸ or it may be associated with unilateral lymphedema,² hemiparesis,²¹ seizures,²¹ or asymmetrical length of legs resulting in scoliosis.^{17, 22} Remarkably, however, neither nevus flammeus nor nevus anemicus appear to be associated with this type of PPV.

PHACOMATOSIS CESIOMARMORATA

This type of PPV is characterized by a coexistence of nevus caesius (blue spot, aberrant Mongolian spot) and cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita (Figure 3). The name phacomatosis cesiomarmorata contains a brief description of the 2 skin disorders. Enjolras and Mulliken⁴ described a 3-month-old boy with this new "type V" PPV. Torrelo and colleagues⁵ observed 2 additional cases, one of which was associated with blue sclerae and slightly diminished corneae. The other case involved hyperplasia of a leg, and a computed tomographic scan showed asymmetry of hemispheres and ventricles. Hence, phacomatosis cesiomarmorata may likewise be associated with extracutaneous defects.

View larger version (79K): [in this window] [in a new window] Figure 3. Phacomatosis cesiomarmorata. A, Frontal aspect, showing multiple blue spots and flaglike areas of reticulated, marblelike erythema. B, Dorsal view, showing bluish macules intermingled with areas of cutis marmorata (reprinted with permission from Br J Dermatol.5 Copyright 2003).

WHY ONLY 3 WELL-DEFINED TYPES?

The traditional type I has not emerged in practice, and the conventional type IV also seems virtually absent. The historic type I was defined as concomitant nevus flammeus and nevus pigmentosus et verrucosus,¹ a term that means a linear epidermal nevus with some pigmentation.¹⁹ The designation "type I" has even been used to describe an unusual co-occurrence of nevus flammeus and Becker nevus.²³ Because neither linear epidermal nevi nor Becker nevus originate from pigmentary cells, the name phacomatosis pigmentovascularis is unsuitable. In other words, type I does not exist.

Type IV was defined as an admixture of types II and III.¹ Apparently, such overlapping phenotypes are extremely rare. It seems unnecessary to create a particular term for such cases that show a protean variability. For practical purposes it is preferable to categorize them within a group of unclassifiable PPV and to describe the particular association of anomalies as observed in a given case (Table).

WHY NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN SUBTYPES "a" AND "b"?

A categorical separation between cases showing exclusively cutaneous changes and those characterized by additional extracutaneous anomalies¹ seems inappropriate. First, in other genetic disorders such as incontinentia pigmenti, cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita or neurofibromatosis 1, we do not make this distinction either. Second, we can never be sure that a supposed type "a" will later not turn out to represent type "b." Third, the additional letter "b" does not contain any information regarding the question of which particular extracutaneous anomalies are present. Therefore, it seems preferable to give an exact description, if necessary, of the associated extracutaneous defects.

CASES OF UNCLASSIFIABLE PPV

Some cases of PPV cannot yet be ascribed to any well-defined clinicogenetic entity. Several authors reported telangiectatic nevi associated with café au lait macules^{1, 24} or nevus depigmentosus.^24-25 Chen and Happle²⁶ reported a case of "phacomatosis multiplex," comprising 5 cutaneous components in the form of telangiectatic nevi, blue spots, café au lait macules, nevus depigmentosus, and nevus sebaceus. Bielsa and colleagues²⁷ described speckled lentiginous nevus associated with nevus anemicus in a patient with bilateral primary lymphedema. From this group of unclassifiable cases, additional well-defined types of PPV may emerge in the future.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Jump to Section  • Top  • Introduction  •  • Author information  • References

Correspondence: Rudolf Happle, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Marburg, Deutschhausstrasse 9, 35033 Marburg, Germany (happle{at}med.uni-marburg.de).

Accepted for Publication: June 11, 2004.

Financial Disclosure: None.

Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, Philipp University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

REFERENCES

Jump to Section  • Top  • Introduction  •  • Author information  • References

1. Hasegawa Y, Yasuhara M. Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis type IVa. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:651-655. ABSTRACT 2. Happle R, Steijlen PM. Phacomatosis pigmentovascularis gedeutet als ein Phänomen der Zwillingsflecken. Hautarzt. 1989;40:721-724. PUBMED 3. Happle R. Loss of heterozygosity in human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:143-161. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED 4. Enjolras O, Mulliken JB. Vascular malformations. In: Harper J, Oranje A, Prose N, eds. Textbook of Pediatric Dermatology. Oxford, England: Blackwell; 2000:975-996. 5. Torrelo A, Zambrano A, Happle R. Cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita and extensive mongolian spots: type 5 phacomatosis pigmentovascularis. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148:342-345. PUBMED 6. Happle R. Neurocutaneous diseases. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, eds. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003:1806-1821. 7. Vidaurri-de la Cruz H, Tamayo-Sanchez L, Duran-McKinster C, Orozco-Covarrubias ML, Ruiz-Maldonado R. Phacomatosis pigmentovascularis IIA and IIB: clinical findings in 24 patients. J Dermatol. 2003;30:381-388. PUBMED 8. Di Landro A, Tadini GL, Marchesi L, Cainelli T. Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis: a new case with renal angiomas and some considerations about the classification. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999;16:25-30. PUBMED 9. Mandt N, Blume-Peytavi U, Pfrommer C, Krengel S, Goerdt S. Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis type IIa. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40:318-321. PUBMED 10. Ruiz-Maldonado R, Tamayo L, Laterza AM, Brawn G, Lopez A. Phacomatosis pigmentovascularis: a new syndrome? report of four cases. Pediatr Dermatol. 1987;4:189-196. PUBMED 11. Bhat J, Batta K, Shah P, Bissenden J, Moss C. Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis type 2: a case report [abstract]. Br J Dermatol. 2002;147(suppl 62):92. 12. Furukawa T, Igata A, Toyokura Y, Ikeda S. Sturge-Weber and Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome with nevus of Ota and Ito. Arch Dermatol. 1970;102:640-645. FULL TEXT | PUBMED 13. Larralde ML, Barquin MA, Casas JG, Sidelsky S. Phacomatosis pigmentovascularis with a selective IgA deficiency. Pediatr Dermatol. 1995;12:159-163. PUBMED 14. Chekroun-Le Du L, Delaporte E, Catteau B, Destée A, Piette F. Phacomatosis pigmentovascularis type II. Eur J Dermatol. 1998;8:569-572. ISI | PUBMED 15. Van Gysel D, Oranje AP, Stroink H, Simonsz HJ. Phacomatosis pigmentovascularis. Pediatr Dermatol. 1996;13:33-35. PUBMED 16. Guiglia MC, Prendiville JS. Multiple granular cell tumors associated with giant speckled lentiginous nevus and nevus flammeus in a child. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:359-363. PUBMED 17. Libow LF. Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis type IIIb. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29:305-307. PUBMED 18. Mahroughan M, Mehregan AH, Mehregan DA. Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis: report of a case. Pediatr Dermatol. 1996;13:36-38. PUBMED 19. Eichenfield LF, Gibbs NF. Hyperpigmentation disorders. In: Eichenfield LF, Frieden IJ, Esterly NB, eds. Textbook of Neonatal Dermatology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2001:370-394. 20. Fishman SJ, Mulliken JB. Vascular anomalies: a primer for pediatricians. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1998;45:1455-1477. FULL TEXT | PUBMED 21. Tsuruta D, Fukai K, Seto M, et al. Phakomatosis pigmentovascularis type IIIb associated with Moyamoya disease. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999;16:35-38. FULL TEXT | PUBMED 22. Sigg C, Pelloni F. Oligosymptomatic form of Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome associated with giant nevus spilus. Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:1284-1285. FULL TEXT | PUBMED 23. Joshi A, Garg VK, Agrawal S, Agarwalla A, Thakur A. Port-wine-stain (nevus flammeus), congenital Becker’s nevus, café-au-lait-macule and lentigines: phakomatosis pigmentovascularis type Ia—a new combination. J Dermatol. 1999;26:834-836. PUBMED 24. De las Heras E, Boixeda JP, Ledo A, Happle R. Paired melanotic and achromic macules in a case of phacomatosis pigmentovascularis: a further example of twin spotting? Am J Med Genet. 1997;70:336-337. PUBMED 25. Dippel E, Utikal J, Feller G, et al. Nevi flammei affecting two contralateral quadrants and nevus depigmentosus: a new type of phacomatosis pigmentovascularis? Am J Med Genet. 2003;119A:228-230. 26. Chen W, Happle R. Phacomatosis pigmentovasculosebacea: an unusual case of phacomatosis multiplex. Eur J Dermatol. 2003;13:231-233. PUBMED 27. Bielsa I, Paradelo C, Ribera M, Ferrándiz C. Generalized nevus spilus and nevus anemicus in a patient with a primary lymphedema: a new type of phakomatosis pigmentovascularis? Pediatr Dermatol. 1998;15:293-295. PUBMED