You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 7, July 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Research Letters
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Dermatology
 •Dermatologic Disorders
 •Public Health
 •Public Health, Other
 •Dermatologic Disorders, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Atypical Mycobacteria Infection Following Tattooing: Review of an Outbreak in 8 Patients in a French Tattoo Parlor

Nicolas Kluger, MD; Christine Muller, MD; Nathalie Gral, MD

Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(7):941-942.

Environmental (atypical) mycobacteria may be inoculated after surgery, acupuncture, mesotherapy, intravenous catheter use, or subcutaneous injections.1-2 Inoculation after tattooing has also been reported in a single case.3 Herein, we describe an outbreak of an undetermined atypical mycobacterial infection after tattooing that occurred in Grenoble, France, during the year 2005.

Report of Cases

Eight otherwise healthy patients (6 men and 2 women; median age, 24 years) were referred to our institution between January and May 2005 for multiple asymptomatic erythematous papules and pustules strictly confined to the gray parts of their tattoos (Table). Findings from examination were otherwise unremarkable. All of the tattoos had been performed in the same parlor by the same artist (Figure). Lesions evolved mostly within 10 to 21 days after the first tattoo session and between 2 and 5 months prior to presentation. Only patient 3 underwent 4 tattoo sessions (1 per month) with the same black ink without any complications before lesions occurred within 10 days after the fifth tattoo session.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table. Main Characteristics of the 8 Study Patients



Figure 1
View larger version (178K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure. Representative tattoos from case patients. A, Pustules and crust restricted to the gray parts of the tattoo (patient 1). B, Erythematous papules and pustules restricted to the lines of the tattoo (patient 2). C, Erythematous papules and pustules restricted to the lines of the tattoo (patient 3). D, Papules confined to the gray parts of the tattoo and sparing the yellow and the orange of the flames (patient 4).


Findings from direct examination, cultures from swabs, and analysis of biopsy specimens were negative for Staphylococcus species, Gram-negative organisms, and Mycobacteria. Acid-fast bacilli staining of a sample from the bottle of tattoo ink used for all the patients proved positive, but culture results were negative, and no organism could be identified.

Histologic studies showed epidermal pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with intracorneal pustules. In the lower skin layers, lymphocytes, plasmocytes, neutrophils, and epithelioid histiocytes infiltrated the dermis, sometimes with a giant cell granulomatous reaction. Exogenous dark pigments were observed within the inflammation, mostly in epithelioid histiocytes. Findings from periodic acid–Schiff and Ziehl-Neelsen staining were negative.

Local antibiotic therapy (fusidic acid) was ineffective in 4 cases. Suspicion of mycobacterial infection prompted us to initiate a 1-month regimen of oral minocycline hydrochloride, 100 mg, twice daily, for 6 patients. Among these 6 patients, 2 patients experienced minocycline-induced vertigo that prompted us to replace minocycline treatment with clarithromycin stearate therapy, 250 mg, twice daily, for 1 month. One patient was immediately given clarithromycin. Finally, 1 patient, treated for 2 months with local antibiotics only (bacitracin and neomycin sulfate), was lost to follow-up. In all 7 cases treated by oral antibiotic therapy, lesions improved within the first month. None of the patients returned for consultation, presumably because complete healing occurred. Five patients were contacted by telephone in October 2007 and reported that no relapse had occurred.


Comment

Pyogenic infections, leprosy, and tuberculosis may occur after tattooing because of lack of hygiene during the procedure, use of dirty tools and/or contaminated pigments, and absence of follow-up care.4 Wolf and Wolf3 reported a case of erythematous nodules that arose in a 3-month-old tattoo. Acid-fast organisms were detected by Ziehl-Neelsen stain, and a common antigen to all Mycobacteria species was found by polymerase chain reaction. Another case involving draining sinuses, abscesses, and acid-fast bacilli found on histologic analysis was reported recently.5

Indications of environmental mycobacterial infection in the present cases include (1) the outbreak presentation; (2) the restriction of the lesions to a single color; (3) the clinical presentation with papules and pustules, formerly described with mycobacterial infection6; (4) the histologic findings of neutrophilic infiltration of the dermis and granulomas; (5) identification of acid-fast bacilli in the ink; and (6) the favorable outcome under treatment with clarithromycin or minocycline. In addition, a similar outbreak was reported in another French tattoo parlor.7 In that case, within 7 to 10 days after tattooing, 20 men, aged 23 to 49 years, developed multiple itchy papules and pustules restricted to the gray parts of the tattoos. Acid-fast bacilli were observed, and Mycobacterium chelonae was identified by culture and polymerase chain reaction. Outcomes were favorable under treatment with clarithromycin and tobramycin.

An atypical mycobacteria might have been the cause of the outbreak in the present cases, although we failed to identify any. Inoculation might have been related to the use of tap water to dilute the black ink and obtain the gray color. A common "mix" was indeed used for all customers during the several months under consideration and left at ambient temperature, potentially allowing the growth of pathogenic mycobacteria. Patient 3 was infected only after the fifth session because the mix was used only at that time. Patient 5 developed lesions quickly (within 5 days) after the third session, indicating a higher concentration of bacteria in the old and used mix. The tattoo artist changed his practice by preparing a fresh mix just before tattooing, allowing patient 5 to undergo his fourth session without any reaction. No other case occurred in the previous 2 years.

This outbreak illustrates the importance of instituting laws and regulations to govern the education of tattoo artists and the practice of applying tattoos.8-9


AUTHOR INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr Gral, 30 Gambetta Blvd, F-38000 Grenoble, France (nathalie.gral{at}wanadoo.fr).

Author Contributions: Dr Kluger had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Kluger. Acquisition of data: Kluger, Muller, and Gral. Analysis and interpretation of data: Kluger, Muller, and Gral. Drafting of the manuscript: Kluger. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kluger, Muller, and Gral. Administrative, technical, and material support: Gral. Study supervision: Muller and Gral.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.


REFERENCES

1. Uslan DZ, Kowalski TJ, Wengenack NL, Virk A, Wilson JW. Skin and soft tissue infections due to rapidly growing mycobacteria: comparison of clinical features, treatment, and susceptibility. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(10):1287-1292. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Wallace RJ Jr, Swenson JM, Silcox VA, Good RC, Tschen JA, Stone MS. Spectrum of disease due to rapidly growing mycobacteria. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5(4):657-679. ISI | PUBMED
3. Wolf R, Wolf D. A tattooed butterfly as a vector of atypical mycobacteria. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(5)(suppl):S73-S74. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
4. Long GE, Rickman LS. Infectious complications of tattoos. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18(4):610-619. ISI | PUBMED
5. De Mora MC, Garzon OE. Atypical mycobacterial infection. Poster presented at: The 21st World Congress of Dermatology; September 30-October 5, 2007; Buenos Aires, Argentina.
6. Joly P, Picard-Dahan C, Bamberger N; et al. Acute pustular eruption: an unusual clinical feature of disseminated mycobacterial infection in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;28(2, pt 1):264-266. ISI | PUBMED
7. De Quatrebarbes J, Pestel-Caron M, Duval Modeste A; et al. Epidémie à Mycobacterium chelonae chez un tatoueur. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2005;132(suppl 9):9S224-9S225.
8. Ejersted A, Lundsgaard J. Outline for a possible regulation of the tattooing and piercing area through a certification and approval arrangement. In: Papameletiou D, Schwela D, Zenie A, eds. Workshop on Technical/Scientific and Regulatory Issues on the Safety of Tattoos, Body Piercing and of Related Practices. Ispra, Italy: Directorate General for Health and Consumer Protection; 2003:93-95.
9. Sainio EL. Education and skills. In: Papameletiou D, Schwela D, Zenie A, eds. Workshop on Technical/Scientific and Regulatory Issues on the Safety of Tattoos, Body Piercing and of Related Practices. Ispra, Italy: Directorate General for Health and Consumer Protection; 2003:96-98.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Motivation for Contemporary Tattoo Removal: A Shift in Identity
Myrna L. Armstrong, Alden E. Roberts, Jerome R. Koch, Jana C. Saunders, Donna C. Owen, and R. Rox Anderson
Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(7):879-884.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.