This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (4)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Public Health  • Public Health, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David L. O’Riordan, PhD; Kevin B. Lunde, BS; Alana D. Steffen, PhD; Jason E. Maddock, PhD

Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:1304-1311.

Objective  To examine the validity of beachgoers' self-reported sun protection and UV exposure using objective measures.

Design  Eighty-eight participants completed a brief survey when they arrived at the beach; their skin was swabbed for the presence of sunscreen, while an observer recorded their clothing worn to the beach and the presence of sunburn. On leaving the beach, an exit survey detailing activities and sun habits while on the beach was completed by the participants, follow-up sunscreen swabs were obtained, and sunburns were recorded. Clothing observations were made for a subgroup (n = 25) of participants during their beach stay.

Results  Most participants (38 [44%]) reported spending 2 to 3 hours at the beach, which was consistent with researcher observations (Spearman rank correlation, r = 0.75). Moderate to substantial agreement was achieved between reported use of sunscreen for the day and sunscreen swabs (, 0.54, 0.70, and 0.72 for the face, legs, and arms, respectively). Participants' self-report of clothing worn to the beach had substantial agreement with researcher observation: coefficients ranged from 0.63 for footwear to 0.77 for head wear. Agreement was variable for clothing worn while on the beach, with slight to fair agreement for sunglasses (, 0.11) and footwear (, 0.23) and substantial agreement for upper body clothing (, 0.79). Agreement between self-reported and observed sunburn was consistently lower (, 0.21, 0.33, and 0.39 for the face, legs, and arms, respectively), with participants reporting more sunburn on arrival than was observed.

Conclusions  Overall, self-report measures of time outside, sunscreen use, and clothing worn demonstrated good criterion validity when compared with observation and sunscreen swabbing. Sunscreen swabbing proved an effective procedure for detecting sunscreen at a beach setting.

Author Affiliations: Prevention and Control Program, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii (Drs O’Riordan and Steffen and Mr Lunde), and Department of Public Health Sciences and Epidemiology (Dr Maddock), University of Hawaii, Honolulu.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Methods in Skin Cancer Prevention: Using a Question-Driven Approach to Guide the Choice of Assessment Approaches
Rob Turrisi, Jerod Stapleton, Kimberley Mallett, and Joel Hillhouse
Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(10):1348-1350.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Controlled Trial of Objective Measures of Sunscreen and Moisturizing Lotion
Elliott et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1399-1402.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Day at the Beach While on Tropical Vacation: Sun Protection Practices in a High-Risk Setting for UV Radiation Exposure
O'Riordan et al.
Arch Dermatol 2008;144:1449-1455.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sunlight exposure assessment: can we accurately assess vitamin D exposure from sunlight questionnaires?
McCarty
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;87:1097S-1101S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identifying Latent Classes of Adults at Risk for Skin Cancer Based on Constitutional Risk and Sun Protection Behavior
Steffen et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1422-1427.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methods in skin cancer prevention: using a question-driven approach to guide the choice of assessment approaches.
Turrisi et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:1348-1350.
FULL TEXT