 |
 |

Treatment of Oral Erosive Lichen Planus With 1% Pimecrolimus CreamA Double-blind, Randomized, Prospective Trial With Measurement of Pimecrolimus Levels in the Blood
Thierry Passeron, MD;
Jean-Philippe Lacour, MD;
Eric Fontas, MD;
Jean-Paul Ortonne, MD
Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(4):472-476.
Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of 1% pimecrolimus cream in treating oral erosive lichen planus and to assess its tolerance.
Design Double-blind randomized trial with placebo control.
Setting Outpatients of the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Nice, from December 21, 2004, to April 19, 2005.
Patients Fourteen consecutive patients with oral erosive lichen planus confirmed by histological examination and with a clinical score superior to 3. Of the 14 patients, 2 did not meet the inclusion criteria and 12 were enrolled in the trial.
Intervention The intervention was 1% pimecrolimus cream or its vehicle, which was applied on ulcerated lesions twice a day for 4 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures The efficacy of the treatment was quantified using a 12-point clinical score. The blood level of pimecrolimus was analyzed on days 0 (baseline), 14, and 28.
Results In the placebo group, the mean score was 4.67 on day 0 vs 3.33 on day 28 (P = .22). In the pimecrolimus group, the mean score was 6.83 on day 0 vs 3.33 on day 28 (P = .04). In the pimecrolimus group, blood concentrations of pimecrolimus were always above the threshold (mean value, 2.84 ng/mL; extreme values, 0-6.19 ng/mL). Pimecrolimus cream was well tolerated, and only transient burning sensations were reported by some subjects. Each of the patients in the pimecrolimus group whose condition improved subsequently relapsed when assessed 1 month after treatment.
Conclusions The 1% pimecrolimus cream seems to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for oral erosive lichen planus. The finding of systemic levels of pimecrolimus after mucosal applications necessitates long-term study because it seems that long-term application is required to maintain clinical improvement.
Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00321750
Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, Archet 2 Hospital (Drs Passeron, Lacour, and Ortonne), and Department of Public Health, Archet 1 Hospital (Dr Fontas), University of Nice, Nice, France.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pentoxifylline for the Treatment of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis
Martin H. Thornhill, Lorena Baccaglini, Elizabeth Theaker, and Michael N. Pemberton
Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(4):463-470.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Oral Lichen Planus: A Case Series With Emphasis on Therapy
Dorothea C. Torti, Joseph L. Jorizzo, and Martha Ann McCarty
Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(4):511-515.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
New and Old Therapeutics for Oral Ulcerations
Alison Bruce and Roy S. Rogers, III
Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(4):519-523.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
New and Old Therapeutics for Oral Ulcerations
Bruce and Rogers
Arch Dermatol 2007;143:519-523.
FULL TEXT
|