This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A. Bernard Ackerman, MD; Maurice M. Tolman, MD
University of Miami School of Medicine 1600 NW Tenth Ave Miami, Fla 33136

Arch Dermatol. 1970;101(2):251.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Drs. Cohen and Frank accurately restate our position that the diagnostic criteria for dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) should be the same in children as in adults—clinical, histologic, and response to therapy. However, we did not state that the predominantly bullous, nonpruritic, sulfoneresistant disease in children should be diagnosed as bullous pemphigoid. That idea, proposed by Kim and Winkelmann,¹ has not yet been validated histologically or by demonstration of the basement membrane antibodies characteristic of bullous pemphigoid.²

We stressed the unique histology of DH in children and adults.^3-5 None of the cases of bullous disease in children reputed to be DH, apparently including those of Drs. Cohen and Frank, have been shown to have that distinctive histology. Should a bullous disease in children, that does not resemble adult DH clinically or histologically, be designated DH solely because it responds to sulfone therapy? We think not. The . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?