You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 102 No. 5, November 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PHOTODERMATITIS FROM A SUNSCREENING AGENT

Thomas F. Goodman, Jr., MD
Department of Dermatology Medical College of Georgia Augusta, Ga 30902

Arch Dermatol. 1970;102(5):563.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

This is a report of contact photodermatitis from the sunscreening agent 2-ethoxyethyl p-methoxycinnamate (EEMC). This agent is present in numerous sun-protective preparations. It rarely causes allergic contact dermatitis.1

Report of a Case.—

A 60-year-old white woman presented with an acute erythematous and vesicular eruption involving the nape of the neck, scattered areas of the face, dorsal surfaces of the arms, and lower anterior thighs. Three days previously, she had applied a sunscreen lotion (Sundare, Texas Pharmacal Company) containing 2-ethoxyethyl p-methoxycinnamate (EEMC) to these areas, then exposed herself to one hour midday summer sunlight. An hour after sunlight exposure she developed raised red areas which progressed to closely spaced large vesicles in 24 hours. The patient was treated with tap water compresses to the affected areas and systemic corticosteroids in decreasing dosages over a two-week period. Three weeks after the eruption the skin was essentially . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.