You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 5, May 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Paraben-Induced Dermatitis-Reply

Donald D. Nuss, MD; John L. Aeling, MD
Denver

Arch Dermatol. 1975;111(5):658.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

We would like to thank Dr. Fisher for his comments regarding the patient we reported with probable systemic eczematous "contact-type" dermatitis associated with parabens. We certainly agree that this must be quite rare, and probably small doses of parenterally administered parabens given intradermally or subcutaneously will not cause a flare of eczematous dermatitis in a previously sensitized patient. However, in our patient a parenterally administered dose was given for mandibular block anesthesia. Our dental colleagues state that 2 to 8 ml of anesthetic solution for dental procedures is commonly used. Also intraoral submucosal tissues are extremely vascular, and certainly a large percentage of the administered dose finds its way directly into the circulation. Nichols and Cutright reported that aramine, aminophylline, epinephrine, and wyamine have almost an identical pharmacologic action when intraoral submucosal administration is compared with intravenous administration (Oral Surg 32:677-684, 1971).

We think that only . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.