This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Klaus E. Andersen, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1979;115(1):97-98.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Cutaneous reactions to implanted materials occur, but implanted cardiac pacemakers rarely have been suspected as the triggering agent. Raque and Goldschmidt¹ described a patient with circumscribed eczematous dermatitis occurring over the site of a pacemaker within three weeks of implantation. Later, widespread nummular eczema developed. The authors discussed whether it was an irritant dermatitis due to a medicalgrade silicone elastomer or nummular eczema provoked by an irritant dermatitis. Patch tests in a patient and two control subjects with the uncured silicone adhesive gave positive reactions that were thought to be irritant reactions. The patient's dermatitis improved even though the pacemaker was not removed. Recently I suspected a patient to have "pacemaker dermatitis." The cause relationship seemed clear, but the mechanism did not.

Report of a Case

A 65-year-old man with Stokes-Adams syndrome had an epoxy-coated pacemaker (Medtronic) implanted subcutaneously in the right infraclavicular region in December 1975. There was . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Dermatology, Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark. Dr Andersen is now at the University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco.

Footnotes
Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?