You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 2, February 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Incidence of a Positive Lupus Band Test Using Sun-Exposed and Unexposed Skin

A. Razzaque Ahmed, MD; Thomas T. Provost, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1979;115(2):228-229.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The incidence of a positive lupus band test (LBT) varies.1 We hypothesized, in view of data reported for New Zealand white and black F1 hybrid mice and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, that this difference in incidence is dependent, for the most part, on the site of biopsy.2 Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the influence of a sun-exposed and nonexposed biopsy site on the incidence of a positive LBT in the same SLE patients.

Subjects and Methods

Nineteen untreated patients satisfying the American Rheumatological Association's (ARA) preliminary criteria for the diagnosis of SLE were observed. Thirteen were female and six were male. All patients had detailed clinical examination with reference to the ARA criteria and the Formula following laboratory values: complete blood cell count; urinalysis; serum creatinine; total hemolytic complement (CH50); and antinuclear antibody. Anti-native DNA antibodies were determined by employing immunofluorescent techniques and Crithidia luciliae as . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo. Dr Ahmed is now with the Department of Dermatology, UCLA School of Medicine. Dr Provost is now with the Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Department of Dermatology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (Dr Ahmed).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.