You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 3, March 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quantitative Enhancement of Dinitrochlorobenzene Responsivity in Women Receiving Oral Contraceptives

Thomas H. Rea, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1979;115(3):361-362.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Enhancement of dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) responsivity by estrogen-progestin combination oral contraceptives or by parenteral progestins was reported by Gerretsen et al.1 Because of a possible influence of contraceptive use on either controls or patients in studies using DNCB, this observation warranted attempted confirmation. Furthermore, the apparent but unexplained protective effect of oral contraceptive use on the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis emphasized the importance of careful study of any immunologic influence of this widely used medication.2

Patients and Methods

Sensitization with DNCB was attempted in 13 women receiving estrogen-progestin combination oral contraceptives for the purpose of contraception, 20 women of similar ages receiving neither estrogens nor progestins, and 16 men of similar ages. The subjects were clinic patients, hospital employees, or medical students judged to be in good general health, without disease, and not taking medications known to influence immunologic responses. Blacks were not included in this study because of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations



From the Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine, and the Department of Dermatology, Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles.


Footnotes



Read before the Western Section of the Society for Investigative Dermatology, Feb 3, 1978, Carmel, Calif.

Reprint requests to 1200 N State St, Los Angeles, CA 90033 (Dr Rea).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.