You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 8, August 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Skin Markers of X-Linked Dominant Chondrodysplasia Punctata

Rudolf Happle, MD
Munster, West Germany

Arch Dermatol. 1979;115(8):931-932.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

In the October 1978 issue of the ARCHIVES (114:1479-1483, 1978), Dr Curth reconsidered her interesting case report of 19491 dealing with the association of follicular atrophoderma and chondrodysplasia punctata. With regard to cause, Dr Curth now suggests either an X-linked dominant gene that is lethal in hemizygous males or an autosomal dominant gene with sex-limited expression. The following arguments are advanced to show that the first possibility is more likely.

The concept of X-linked dominant chondrodysplasia punctata was proposed because of two facts.2,3 First, some patients with chondrodysplasia punctata show widespread atrophic skin lesions and alopecia, and occasionally also pigmentary disturbances that may easily be confused with incontinentia pigmenti of the Bloch-Sulzberger type. This pattern of skin lesions suggests functional X-chromosome mosaicism. Consequently, in involved areas the X chromosome carrying the mutant gene should be active, whereas in uninvolved skin the normal X chromosome should be . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.