You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 8, August 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Duplicate Publications (?)-Reply

Rhonda B. Rogers, MD; Kim B. Yancey, MD; Bruce S. Allen, MD
Department of Dermatology Margaret F. Guill, MD Allergy-Immunology Section Department of Pediatrics Medical College of Georgia Augusta, GA 30912

Arch Dermatol. 1984;120(8):992.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

We have read Dr Goldsmith's comments and agree that it was an error for these publications not to have acknowledged each other at the time of their submission. These two manuscripts were prepared independently by the two medical staffs responsible for this unusual patient's care. The focus of these manuscripts was intended to be different—each describing details relevant to the respective specialty. The report in the ARCHIVES was a succinct description of this patient's clinical course and response to therapy. The report in the pediatric literature included three clinical photographs, light and electron microscopy of lesional skin, and a more general discussion of epidermolysis bullosa. We regret any problems or misinterpretations raised by this issue.

Editor's Note.—

A review of both articles reveals that they discuss the same patient and that neither contains essential information that is absent from the other. All authors of the publication in the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.