You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 2, February 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Vignettes
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Chloracetamide: An Unusual Cause of Cosmetic Dermatitis

Susan E. Koch, MD; Toby Mathias, MD; Howard I. Maibach, MD
Department of Dermatology University of California Medical Center San Francisco, CA 94143

Arch Dermatol. 1985;121(2):172-173.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Allergic contact dermatitis from the use of skin care products and cosmetics containing chloracetamide has been reported in several countries in Europe.1 Apparently, no such cases have occurred in the United States. The US distributor of this preservative states that chloracetamide is not presently registered or sold for use in cosmetics in the United States, although it is sold as an industrial biocidal preservative. Thus, it is logical to expect that chloracetamide contact allergy will not occur from cosmetic products in the United States. However, we recently encountered a case of contact allergy to chloracetamide due to purchase of an imported topical spray astringent formulated in France. We therefore wish to alert dermatologists to exposure to chloracetamide in imported cosmetics formulated abroad that may contain this potent sensitizer.

Report of a Case.—

A 40-year-old woman had a six-month history of a recurrent pruritic facial dermatitis that . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.