You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 5, May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Comments and Opinions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Urticaria and Angioedema due to Topically Applied Chloramphenicol Ointment

Miriam Schewach-Millet, MD; Dorit Shpiro, MD
Department of Dermatology Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel-Hashomer, Israel

Arch Dermatol. 1985;121(5):587.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

We read with interest the article in the July issue of the ARCHIVES by Schechter et al.1 We would like to report a case of urticaria and angioedema and another case of urticaria, following the use of topically applied chloramphenicol ointment 3%.

Report of Cases.—Case 1.—

A 30-year-old woman was treated with chloramphenicol ointment 3% for otitis externa. She had no history of allergy, but two days after the application of chloramphenicol ointment, she developed redness, swelling, and irritation of the treated area. Ten days later, she was admitted to the hospital for urticaria and angioedema.

Case 2.—

A 54-year-old otherwise healthy woman was treated with chloramphenicol ointment 3% for a finger wound. A few days later, her finger became swollen and red; one week later, she developed severe urticaria. The patient stated that chloramphenicol ointment was the only medication she had used.

Comment.—

It appears . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.