You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 5, May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Comments and Opinions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Importance of Appropriate Wavelength, Dosage, and Test Site in the Experimental Reproduction of Polymorphous Light Eruption

Terry W. Marsh, MD; Robert L. Rietschel, MD
Department of Dermatology 207 Woodruff Memorial Building Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, GA 30322

Arch Dermatol. 1985;121(5):587.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Those readers who may have been inspired by the two recent articles on polymorphous light eruption (PMLE)1,2 may find the points identified in the following case helpful when considering photo testing to confirm the diagnosis of PMLE. A number of standard dermatology texts indicate that the experimental reproduction PMLE is best done by administering repeated courses of ultraviolet B (UV-B) irradiation at several times the minimal erythema dose.3,4 The need to induce a phototoxic event to experimentally reproduce an eruption that occurs naturally without phototoxic levels of irradiation suggests that additional factors may need to be considered when photo testing is planned. We recently saw a patient who demonstrates this point very clearly.

Report of a Case.—

A 44-year-old truck driver was seen with a history of a pruritic papular eruption involving the neck, forearms, legs, and back that typically began approximately eight hours after . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.