You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 7, July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Vignettes
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Histologic Artifact due to Madajet

Joel Lamm, MD; Peter Niebyl, MD; Antoinette Hood, MD
Department of Dermatology The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes 600 N Wolfe St Baltimore, MD 21205

Arch Dermatol. 1985;121(7):835-836.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

The Madajet is a new needleless injection instrument with several applications promoted by the manufacturer. One of these applications is the infiltration of skin with a local anesthetic prior to biopsy. Use of the Madajet is advertised to "relieve much of the psychological fear and trauma associated with traditional needle and syringe injections" (Mada Medical Products Inc, publication MJ 1281).

We recently examined eight skin specimens taken by shave biopsy after injection of local anesthetic with the Madajet. The local anesthetic, lidocaine with or without epinephrine, was injected directly into the lesional skin.

An unusual histologic feature was noted in all specimens. Irregularly shaped, variably sized holes resembling "swiss cheese" were noted in the papillary and midreticular dermis (Figs 1 and 2). Except for the lack of an inflammatory cell response, these findings were similar to those described in paraffin granulomas and other foreign-body granulomas.1 In . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.