You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 7, July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Vignettes
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors Are Not Increased in Generalized Essential Telangiectasia

John R. Person, MD; Christopher Longcope, MD
Department of Dermatology The Fallon Clinic 630 Plantation St Worcester, MA 01605; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Massachusetts Medical Center Worcester

Arch Dermatol. 1985;121(7):836-837.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Generalized essential telangiectasia is an uncommon disorder.1-4 It is seen primarily in women,2 is sometimes familial,4 and the average age at onset is 38 years.2 The telangiectasias slowly progress over years or decades2,3 and are not accompanied by associated systemic problems.2 The telangiectasias vary in pattern and distribution and may respond to tetracycline hydrochloride.2,3

Unilateral nevoid telangiectasia is a similar but segmental disorder5-8 that is seen more commonly. It usually occurs in women at puberty, during pregnancy, or while taking oral contraceptives5,6 but has also occurred in men with cirrhosis of the liver,6 a finding that is reminiscent of the onset of vascular spiders.7 It was therefore hypothesized that estrogenic stimulation was involved in the pathogenesis of the disorder.6,8 This theory was given considerable impetus in 1983 when Uhlin and McCarty9 found a severalfold . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.