You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 9, September 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Comments and Opinions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita With Negative Direct Immunofluorescence

Jean Philippe Lacour, MD; Jean Paul Ortonne, MD
Service de Dermatologie Hôpital Pasteur B P 69 06002 Nice Cédex, France

Arch Dermatol. 1986;122(9):972.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

A case of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) without immunoreactants similar to ours has been recently reported.1 The authors also did not specify the sites from which their two biopsy specimens were taken.

We agree with Dusdet et al2 that it would be of interest to undertake a study on regional variation of the expression of EBA antigen. This is an absolute prerequisite before isolating a distinct subgroup of EBA without immunoglobulin deposits in the skin. There is an apparent correlation between the expression of bullous pemphigoid antigen and the location of clinical lesions.3 It is not yet established if this statement applies to EBA. However, this would suggest that skin lesions in this disorder are localized at sites of maximal concentrations of EBA antigen. This was obviously not the case in our patient as most biopsy specimens were taken from involved skin on the legs. In addition, suction blisters were raised on the abdomen of our patient, and a biopsy of these blisters was performed. Direct immunofluorescence on blisters and peribullous skin was negative. The possibility that IgG deposits were . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.