You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 10, October 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Comments and Opinions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Mohs Micrographic Surgery as Only Means of Optimal Patient Outcome?-Reply

June K. Robinson, MD
Departments of Dermatology and Surgery Northwestern University Medical School Chicago, IL 60611

Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(10):1269-1270.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

The title of the editorial was a question: "What Are Adequate Treatment and Follow-up Care for Nonmelanoma Cutaneous Cancer?"1 Rather than seeking to provide definitive answers, it sought primarily to stimulate study and discussion that would lead to establishment of better guidelines for the management of smaller and earlier basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. It urged all physicians to use the data now emerging from well-designed studies and documented case reports to reexamine traditional clinical judgments. To the extent that such reexamination suggests changes in existing practice, it is both proper and inevitable that those suggestions will be controversial.

The recommendations challenged by Drs Sherwin and Goldschmidt were part of a commentary that examined the clinical implications of the data reported in three original articles appearing in that issue of the ARCHIVES.2-4 Two of these addressed surgical margins and surgical technique and pointed out the risk . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.