You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 12, December 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Comments and Opinions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Acquired Nonfamilial Melanoma: An Inappropriate Conclusion

Ramon M. Fusaro, MD, PhD; Henry T. Lynch, MD
Section of Dermatology Department of Internal Medicine University of Nebraska Medical Center 42nd Street and Dewey Avenue Omaha, NE 68105-1065; Department of Preventive Medicine Hereditary Cancer Institute and Consultative Center Creighton University Medical School Omaha, NE 68178

Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(12):1595-1596.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Duray and Ernstoff1 described 14 patients (probands) with acquired nonfamilial melanoma in which seven patients had histologically dysplastic nevi associated with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. In defining their methodology, they made several statements that are crucial to understanding their conclusion. They stated that (1) "Our study was conducted primarily as a pathologic and medical chart review, with aid from the attending clinicians, and not as a detailed interview with multiple family members, yielding detailed pedigree studies"; (2) "We reviewed all histologic slides, pathologic reports, medical records (with the aid of the tumor registrar), and further information from the clinical attending physicians"; and (3) "All patients had no family histories for melanoma (back two generations) and thus were considered to have nonfamilial melanoma."

The authors did not detail the depth of genetic verification of informative data on the pedigrees. It must be assumed that the information was . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.