You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 127 No. 1, January 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  VIGNETTES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pruritic Urticarial Plaques and Papules of Pregnancy and Skin Distention

Marie Anne Beckett, MD; Neil S. Goldberg, MD
Department of Dermatology New York Medical College Valhalla, NY 10595

Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(1):125-126.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Pruritic urticarial plaques and papules of pregnancy (PUPPP) is a distinct dermatosis of pregnancy that has recently been associated with abdominal skin distention.1 We describe two cases, a triplet pregnancy and a case of polyhydramnios, that support this association. These are the first reported cases of PUPPP associated with in vitro fertilization.

Report of Cases.—CASE 1.—

A 36-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 0) carrying triplets who were the result of in vitro fertilization developed an intensely pruritic rash over her abdomen during the 35th week of pregnancy. The rash started in the striae of her abdomen and spread to cover her inner arms, ankles, and wrists with urticarial plaques. The rash was treated with topical steroids.

She went into labor the day of her dermatology consultation and was delivered of healthy triplets by cesarean section. The infants had no skin lesions. A skin biopsy . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.