You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 13 No. 2, February 1926 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correction
 This Article
 •Full text PDF of this Correction
 •Original article not online
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CORRECTION

Arch Derm Syphilol. 1926;13(2):242.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Dr. Charles J. White calls attention to an error in the prescription for crude coal tar incorporated in his discussion of this subject before the American Dermatological Association, May 4, 1925, as reported in the ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY AND SYPHILOLOGY, December, 1925, p. 896. The prescription should read: Crude coal tar, one-half drachm; zinc oxide, one-half drachm; petrolatum, one ounce. The author's comment is: "This is too good a prescription to be spoilt." . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1926 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.