You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 10, October 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence: Vignettes
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Lichen Planus Following Hepatitis B Vaccination

François Aubin, MD
Department of Functional Dermatology University Hospital 25030 Besançon Cedex, France

Régis Angonin, MD; Philippe Humbert, MD; Pierre Agache, MD
Besançon, France

Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(10):1329-1330.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The association of lichen planus (LP) with liver diseases, first described in 1978 by Rebora et al,1 has successively been confirmed by numerous observations.2 However, the role played by hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains to be explained. We describe a man in whom LP developed after an HBV vaccination. Two analogous cases have been observed previously,3,4 and our observation suggests that the vaccine could be involved in the pathogeny.

Report of a Case.

A 50-year-old man who was at risk forHBV infection received HBV vaccine (Gen Hevac B, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France). This is a noninfectant recombinant vaccine produced in mammalian cells, which contains the S and pre-S2 antigens involving the products of the S and pre-S2 regions of HBV DNA. The first dose of vaccine (0.5 mL) was given to our patient in June 1992 and the second (0.5 mL) 1 month later. In August, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.