 |
 |

Pseudolymphoma?-Reply
Elia Roo, MD;
Cristina Villegas, MD;
Eduardo Lopez-Bran, MD;
Esther Jimenez, MD;
Pilar Valle, MD;
Evaristo Sanchez-Yus, MD
Department of Dermatology Hospital Universitario San Carlos Zurbano 25 28010 Madrid, Spain
Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(2):226.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
We appreciate the comments by Dr Cerroni concerning our article; we know of his expertise in the field of immunophenotyping of cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders. The expression of some T-cell—associated antigens by B lymphocytes is a frequent and useful criterion to identify some B lymphocytes, both in frozen and in paraffin-embedded sections.
Let us supply some further histologic data. Our immunohistochemical studies were performed on paraffinembedded sections with the following antibodies: Mtl, UCHL1, L26, MB-2, and anti and anti light chains. More than 90% of lymphoid cells were positive for anti—T-cell antibodies (MT1 and UCHL1); less than 10% were positive forantiB-cell antibodies (126 and MB-2). Normal-appearing plasma cells, containing both and light chains, were scattered throughout the infiltrate, mainly in the periphery of the nodules. Histiocytic cells, not reactive with the above= mentioned antibodies, formed eccentrically situated groups within the nodules.
These data, and those previously mentioned, prompt us
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|