You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 9, September 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence: Comments and Opinions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Role of Genetic Variation in Thiopurine Methyltransferase Activity and Efficacy and/or Side Effects of Azathioprine Therapy in Dermatologic Patients

Alexander Anstey, MRCP; Lynne Lennard, PhD
Department of Dermatology Royal Gwent Hospital Newport, Wales NP9 2UB; Sheffield, England

Arch Dermatol. 1995;131(9):1087-1088.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Snow and Gibson1 should be congratulated for their article in the February 1995 issue of the ARCHIVES that highlighted the interindividual variation in azathioprine metabolism in dermatologic patients. We were interested to observe how closely the conclusions of this study conformed to our previous predictions.2 There are, however, a number of points that merit comment. The first study to have investigated the variable response to azathioprine by the measurement of the active nucleotide metabolites in dermatologic patients was published by one of us (L.L.) in 1987 and concerned four patients with pemphigus vulgaris.3 This was followed 2 years later by a more detailed study in which two of five study patients and the majority of the control group of 16 patients were dermatologic patients (for reasons of expediency rather than any particular interest in studying dermatologic patients).4 It would, of course, be misleading to imply that . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.