You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 6, June 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CORRESPONDENCE: COMMENTS AND OPINIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Juvenile Xanthogranuloma, Neurofibromatosis, and Juvenile Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

Alex Zvulunov, MD
Department of Dermatology Soroka Medical Center Beer-Sheva 84101, Israel

Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(6):712-713.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I read with great interest the editorial comments by Riccardi1 on the possible research implications of the article recently published by my colleagues and myself.2 However, I was confused by the notion of "the lack of an excess of inherited cases among patients with the triad of NF-1, JXG, and JCML." Our study showed a significant excess of familial neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) among patients with the triad compared with patients with NF-1 and juvenile xanthogranuloma (JXG) but without juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia (JCML) (85% vs 47%, P<.003). As I read further about "the canceling out of this excess [male preponderance] when the triad is present," the source of this and the previous misinterpretation has become obvious. The error was found in the labeling of two columns in Table 3 in the published article (Table, corrected); the column labeled JXG+NF+JCML and the corresponding footnote should now be . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.