This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The State of (Measuring) the Art

Mary-Margaret Chren, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(11):1349-1351.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

WHY A theme issue on quality of care? Most dermatologists probably believe that the quality of our care has never been better. The problem is that we now have to prove what before we may have accepted on faith. To do that, we must agree on what quality is and we must measure it accurately.¹

Ironically, many physicians are ambivalent about the current preoccupation with measuring quality of care. In the past, simply the implicit commitment of each physician to try to choose the best care for each patient seemed sufficient. Now we not only must answer in more formal and public ways about our care but also our answers must include precise gauges of what we had heretofore assumed was part of the art of medicine (and which, like all art, defies measurement).

What has happened, of course, is that decision making in health care has become more . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Department of Dermatology and the UCSF-Mt Zion Center on Aging University of California, San Francisco San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center 111 (G) 4150 Clement St San Francisco, CA 94121 (e-mail: mmchren@orca.ucsf.edu)

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?