This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

H. J. Parkhurst, M.D.; Charles G. LaRocco, M.D.

Arch Derm Syphilol. 1928;18(6):937-951.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A CASE for DIAGNOSIS. Presented by DR. COLE and DR. DRIVER.

R. W., a boy, aged 7, had had a bullous eruption since July 1, 1926. The eruption was of generalized distribution, and the mucosae were involved. The bullae tended to rupture, leaving a hemorrhagic, excoriated base, with signs of secondary infection. They had appeared in successive outbreaks, especially on the hands, face and feet. There were a few small bullae at the time of presentation. All laboratory and diagnostic tests were essentially negative.

DISCUSSION

DR. ORMSBY, Chicago: In this case, pemphigus, dermatitis herpetiformis and erythema multiforme must be considered as possibilities. Pemphigus is the most likely diagnosis, and dermatitis herpetiformis stands second, but erythema multiforme cannot be ruled out.

DR. COLE: Last year Dr. Gans, of Heidelberg, called it dermatitis herpetiformis.

GRANULOMA INGUINALE. Presented by DR. COLE and DR. DRIVER.

C. W., a negro, aged 60, had been shot in the penis with a revolver twenty years previously, and fifteen years before presentation he had . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?