You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 21 No. 5, May 1930 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE KAHN AND HINTON REACTIONS

NATHAN NAGLE, A.B.; JOSEPH C. WILLETT, D.V.M.

Arch Derm Syphilol. 1930;21(5):836-838.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

An opportunity was afforded to compare the test for syphilis recently proposed by Hinton with the Kahn reaction, which is the standard method in these laboratories. The technic of the two tests was carried out strictly in accordance with the directions of the respective authors.1 Dr. Hinton furnished the antigen for his test. Table 1 summarizes the results given by the two methods with 748 serums. Of this number, 363 were positive with the Kahn test and 299 were positive with the Hinton test. Sixty-nine serums were positive with the Kahn and negative with the Hinton test, and five were positive with the Hinton and negative with the Kahn test.

An attempt was made to determine the clinical histories of the seventy-four cases which showed divergent results. Data were obtained on only forty-four of these cases, which are presented in table 2. It is evident from this table that . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ST. LOUIS

From the St. Louis Health Division Laboratories.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication, Oct. 16, 1929.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1930 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.