This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Max Scheer, M.D.; John Frank Fraser, M.D.

Arch Derm Syphilol. 1930;22(4):722-733.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

PERIPHLEBITIS NODULARIS NECROTICANS. Presented by DR. JOSEPH J. ELLER.

A. M., a man, aged 20, was presented at the February, 1930, meeting of the New York Dermatological Society by Dr. MacKee.

DISCUSSION

DR. DAVID L. SATENSTEIN: There has been considerable discussion concerning the differentiation between erythema induratum and periphlebitis nodularis necroticans. In Bazin's disease one finds tubercles plus inflammatory process with or without necrosis or granulation tissue, depending on the stage of evolution. In periphlebitis nodularis necroticans, there is necrosis of the vessel wall and of the surrounding tissue and cellular infiltrate. There is no suggestion of tubercles. The observations corresponded to those reported by L. Phillippson in 1901 (Arch. f. Dermat. u. Syph.55:215, 1901) under the title of "Periphlebitis Nodularis Necroticans." I was not the originator of this clinical name.

Dr. Walter J. Highman:

Were the infiltrations only around the veins?

Dr. David L. Satenstein:

I could . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?