You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 22 No. 6, December 1930 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Society Transactions
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

BROOKLYN DERMATOLOGICAL SOCIETY

E. Almore Gauvain, M.D.; Arthur M. Persky, M.D.

Arch Derm Syphilol. 1930;22(6):1107-1112.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

ERYTHEMA TOXICUM. Presented by DR. ABRAHAM WALZER.

H. N., a woman, aged 21, single, had an eruption of ten days' duration. There was no history of her having received any drugs or injections. The entire body, except the face, was covered with many scattered and grouped erythematous, papular and vesicular lesions varying in size from that of a pinhead to that of a pea or even larger. They had been pruriginous at the start. On the trunk, the lesions were dark violet-red and were involuting, giving the appearance almost of lichen planus. In many locations, the papules were each surmounted by a small central crust. On diascopic pressure, the old lesions showed some pigmentation, but the newer ones completely disappeared.

DISCUSSION

DR. ELIAS W. ABRAMOWITZ: The patient presents a follicular eruption that has rapidly become generalized. On the trunk, the eruption follows the lines of cleavage. While there are a few lesions on the hands, there are no lesions in the mouth and no systemic disturbance. Even though there is no evidence now of a primary or herald plaque, I am inclined to favor the diagnosis of a follicular type of pityriasis rosea on account of the points mentioned and the absence of itching. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1930 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.