This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

E. B. RITCHIE, M.D.; RUTH HERRICK, M.D.; J. M. van de ERVE, M.D.

Arch Derm Syphilol. 1934;29(6):835-844.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

During the past ten years, precipitation tests for syphilis have been rapidly assuming a place of increasing importance in serodiagnosis. During this same period, the complement-fixation tests have also been undergoing modification and standardization. In clinical work the questions arise as to which tests to use and as to the relative reliance which may be placed on them. From the practical standpoint, any test must be judged by the following criteria: (1) sensitivity and specificity, (2) ease in reading results, (3) simplicity of performance (including the use of apparatus and biologic materials), (4) rapidity of performance and (5) the purpose for which the test is to be used. Obviously, a test which meets these requirements, is sufficiently sensitive and is easily performed will best meet the demands of the clinician. The amount of serum required for the test is sometimes also important, as in the case of infants.

Since the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS; GRAND RAPIDS, MICH.; CHICAGO

From the Section of Dermatology and the Serological Laboratory of the Department of Medicine, University of Chicago.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?