This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

CULTURAL EXPERIENCES

GEORGE M. LEWIS, M.D.; MARY E. HOPPER, M.S.

Arch Derm Syphilol. 1943;47(1):27-35.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In a prior communication¹ we have stressed the close relation which usually exists between the clinical appearance of a superficial fungous eruption and the species of infecting micro-organism responsible for it. Increased experience tends to corroborate this phase of practical mycology. We have found that repeated cultures have often resulted in finding of a suspected fungus when the first attempt was barren of results or productive of only nonpathogenic strains of fungi.

Determinative procedures available for investigating suspected fungous infections of the skin are sometimes inadequate to enable one to decide whether the fungus found on culture is primarily causative or a secondary invader. The mere finding of certain fungi which are of known pathogenic titer is usually considered sufficient evidence of pathogenicity. However, one may be in error if one trusts one's ability to obtain pathogenic material in any given case unless there is opportunity for prolonged study . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
NEW YORK

From the New York Hospital and the Department of Medicine (Dermatology) Cornell University Medical College.

Footnotes
Aided by a grant from the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?