This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

LIEUTENANT COMMANDER FREDERICK G. NOVY, Jr.

Arch Derm Syphilol. 1944;49(3):172-173.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Tattooing is an ancient and still common custom in the Navy. It is remarkable that more accidents do not follow this procedure. The so-called "artists" that do the tattooing have no concept of antisepsis; their places of business and their instruments are for the most part filthy. Nevertheless, infections are extremely rare when one considers the large number of tattoos that adorn the bodies of the Naval personnel. Nearly every Naval physician has seen a few pyogenic infections arising from this practice. Syphilis and tuberculosis have occasionally been reported following tattooing. A theoretic explanation of the low incidence of infection may be found in the fact that one of the red dyes contains cinnabar, which is mercuric sulfide. This chemical may act as an antiseptic as the needles and other instruments are constantly dipped into the dye.

General chemical reactions to the dyes are rare. When . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
MC-V(S), U.S.N.R.

Footnotes
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the writer and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Navy Department or the Naval Service at large.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?