You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 69 No. 4, April 1954 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

ROLE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN THERAPY OF ACNE

HARRY M. ROBINSON, Jr., M.D.

AMA Arch Derm Syphilol. 1954;69(4):414-417.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE ROLE of pyogenic bacteria in the production of acne pustules has evoked considerable discussion among dermatologists, and there is a wide divergence of opinion concerning its importance. Comparative studies reveal that most authors agree that the management of the recurrent cystic and large indurated acne lesions presents a therapeutic challenge. In Becker's series of 65 patients he performed bacteriologic studies and recovered hemolytic Staphylococcus albus in 7, nonhemolytic Staphylococcus albus in 25, hemolytic Staphylococcus aureus in 3, nonhemolytic Staphylococcus aureus in 12, a mixed growth of bacteria in 8, and no growth in the remaining 10. Sensitivity tests indicated that the organisms were more highly sensitive to penicillin than to the other antibiotics; however, clinical tests did not support these findings.

Sulzberger and Baer reported excellent results with local injections of aqueous solutions of penicillin and of bacitracin directly into the cystic lesions after aspiration of the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BALTIMORE

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine.


Footnotes

This study was supported by grants-in aid from the Abbott Laboratories, Charles Pfizer & Company, and the Upjohn Company.

Read in the Section on Pharmaceutical Therapeutics of the American Academy of Dermatology and Syphilology at the 12th Annual Meeting, Chicago, Dec. 10, 1953.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1954 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.