 |
 |

Amodiaquin (Camoquin) in the Treatment of Chronic Discoid Lupus ErythematosusPreliminary Report, with Special Reference to the Successful Response of Patients Resistant to Other Antimalarial Drugs
ROBERTS B. PAPPENFORT, M.D.;
Capt. JAMES H. LOCKWOOD
AMA Arch Derm. 1956;74(4):384-386.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Amodiaquin (Camoquin), first synthesized in 1946 by Burckhalter and associates,1 is one of the 4-aminoquinolines, a group of compounds discovered after the development of quinacrine (Atabrine). Extensive investigations in the period 1946 to 1954 with these compounds, particularly chloraquine and amodiaquin, firmly established their value in the suppressive treatment of vivax and falciparum malaria.2 The value of chloroquine and quinacrine in the treatment of discoid lupus erythematosus is well established and need not be reviewed.
Having almost simultaneously encountered two patients with chronic discoid lupus erythematosus who failed to respond to quinacrine and chloroquine therapy, we decided to try amodiaquin, since a small supply was available to one of us (R. B. P.) through a local pharmacy. The results in these and in subsequent patients were very gratifying, thus prompting this preliminary report.
Report of Cases
CASE 1.—A 31-year-old white woman was
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
San Diego, Calif.; (MC), U.S.N.
From the private practice of Dr. R. B. pappenfort, and the Dermatology Service of Capt. James H. Lockwood (MC), U.S.N., U. S. Naval Hospital, San Diego, Calif.
Footnotes
Submitted for publication Nov. 28, 1955.
Camoquin hydrochloride is supplied by Parke-Davis & Company, in tablets of 0.20 gm. of Camoquin base.
Permission was given by Philip K. Allen, M.D., for the use of Cases 3, 4, and 8; by Werner W. Duemling, M.D., for Case 5, and by Leonard C. Greenfield, M.D., for Cases 6 and 7.
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the writers and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the view of the Navy Department or the Naval Service at large.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|