You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 74 No. 4, October 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Notes, New Instruments and Techniques
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

ALOPECIA AREATA OCCURRING SIMULTANEOUSLY IN IDENTICAL TWINS

ABRAHAM I. WEIDMAN, M.D.; LENA S. ZION, M.D.; ALFRED E. MAMELOK, M.D.

AMA Arch Derm. 1956;74(4):424-426.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The occurrence of alopecia areata in twins is rather uncommon, and to the best of our knowledge has never been reported to occur in circumstances similar to those here presented.

The unusual features of our case are the appearance of a patch of alopecia areata in both patients at about the same time, in the same location, and following an identical operation performed on the same day. The condition, however, has been observed in several members of the same, family and reported by Poynton,1 Zinsser,2 Warren,3 and others.* In the case described by Warren, alopecia areata occurred in a 6-month-old boy whose father, grand-mother, uncle, and great aunt at some period of their lives, suffered from alopecia areata. Hiram E. Miller, in discussing a paper by Clark and Stibbens,4 mentions an instance of twins who developed alopecia areata three months apart. The lesions were not . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Brooklyn; New York


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Dec. 30, 1955.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.