You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 77 No. 5, May 1958 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Histochemical Observations on Parakeratosis

KARL STEINER, M.D.; Ethel Suben, B.A.

AMA Arch Derm. 1958;77(5):586-592.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Parakeratosis is so characteristic and occurs in so many skin diseases that an adequate knowledge of its histochemistry appears indispensable. Nevertheless, many histochemical characteristics of parakeratosis still are largely unknown. The following study was undertaken to investigate some of these characteristics.

Beginning with Giroud and his collaborators, in 1929, several investigators used different stains for the determination of sulfhydryl (SH) in normal and abnormal epidermis. All of these stains revealed more SH in the parakeratin than in the viable epidermal cells and much more than in normal keratin (Percival and Stewart, Lapière, Hollander et al., Zingsheim, and others). However, prior to Barrnett and Seligman's dihydroxy-dinaphthyl-disulfide (DDD) reaction supplemented by thioglycolic acid (1954) no histochemical estimate of the total sulfur was possible, i. e., of disulfides (SS) as well as of SH. This estimate, however, appears to be important because of the following reasons. Observations with DDD . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Brooklyn

From the Medical Service, Section of Dermatology, Veterans' Administration Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology and Syphilology, State University of New York College of Medicine at New York.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Aug. 16, 1957.

Mr. Luther R. Gilliam, B.P.A. made the microphotographs.

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health, U. S. Public Health Service Grant RG-4961.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1958 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.