This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (5)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

HOWARD HAILEY, M.D.

AMA Arch Derm. 1958;77(6):729-731.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This report is of an unusual skin eruption which has precluded a fitting diagnosis up to the present time. Fourteen pathologists have examined the slides and have seen the pictures of the eruption. An additional 8 or 10 dermatologists have seen the pictures or the patient. No two dermatohistopathologists have offered the same suggested tentative diagnosis.

Report of a Case

A white boy aged 14 first came to the office on May 12, 1956. The mother accompanied the boy and said that she brought him because of his ``ringworms,'' which he had had for about three years. The eruption began on the forearm and has progressed. Various remedies have been used to no avail. There are no subjective symptoms. The eruption is symmetrical. The areas involved are the sides of the face and neck, the forearms, the elbow regions, and the knee regions. The eruption is papular and is . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Atlanta

Footnotes
Recorded for publication Jan. 14, 1958.

Formerly Associate Clinical Professor of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine.

Read before the 77th Annual Meeting of the American Dermatological Association, Inc., Belleair, Fla., April 16, 1957.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?